Three federal judges have struck down Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship since he signed it in January 2025. Now, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case.
I don’t think it’s ethically wrong to have migration policies in place, no. If we didn’t it would easily enable certain countries with gigantic populations to essentially take over the world.
I don’t see anything immoral or unethical about the legal immigration system in the USA for example, do you?
What if “the right way” is purposely blocked or made impossible?
A lot of American history has clear demonstration of using the letter of the law to impede people trying to live their life.
Georgia city clerk: “Oh sorry, we need you to bring your land ownership forms. Don’t own land? Well, this office is closed for lunch, have a good day”.
Why does your nation having more refugees etc matter?
Illegal immigration is wrong. If you want to live in another country, follow the rules and do it the right way.
I get that it’s legally wrong, but do you think it’s ethically wrong?
What if someone thinks the laws and systems in place aren’t morally perfect?
I don’t think it’s ethically wrong to have migration policies in place, no. If we didn’t it would easily enable certain countries with gigantic populations to essentially take over the world.
I don’t see anything immoral or unethical about the legal immigration system in the USA for example, do you?
What certain countries? And are you alleging there is a coordinated “take over”?
Removed by mod
Fascinating! What other countries do you think would start taking over places without immigration laws?
deleted by creator
What if “the right way” is purposely blocked or made impossible?
A lot of American history has clear demonstration of using the letter of the law to impede people trying to live their life.
Georgia city clerk: “Oh sorry, we need you to bring your land ownership forms. Don’t own land? Well, this office is closed for lunch, have a good day”.
Then you don’t get to go and live in that country.