Just wanted to know what you guys consider to be better when torrenting. Is it I2P network or a VPN like Mullvad, Proton or IVPN?

  • Octavusss@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Since I care more about anonymity I think I would rather sacrifice speed and use I2p even on clearnet.

      • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 months ago

        Torrenting on Tor actually hurts the network. Compare that to I2P where it makes the network better. I2P is designed with torrenting in mind.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Got a source for that? Torrenting “hurts” tor 'cos it uses up bandwidth that could be used for useful stuff like comms from journalists, dissidents, etc.

          But IIRC tor was designed with clearnet in mind whereas I2P is “self-centered”.

          Do you mean accessing I2P implies using an I2IP router to begin with?

          • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It not only hurts tor because it usage up bandwith but in other ways as well. Torrenting makes many peer to peer connections which hurts tor in multiple ways. I suggest reading the docs of tor to better understand how and why this is.

            I dont understand your question about I2P. You need some form of I2P router to use I2P in anyway.

      • Octavusss@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the I2P is better designed for torrenting plus Tor is just way too slow especially for bigger files simce most people only use tor but don’t run their own relays.