I’ve had problems with ghost touches on my fp4. customer service just doesn’t respond. I also get weird app crashes. can’t recommend the company like this. long term support was the whole point!!
I had ghost touches on my old Motorola. I never could figure out any pattern or cause for the problem. But a restart seemed to resolve it
i have same problem with ghost touch, though it seems it happens only under certain kind of unknown conditions. I think it might have something to do with moisture in air and/or some other unknown thing.
I own a FP4 and I’ve been on Android 15 for a while now, as I run iodéOS … To me it is astonishing how a thrid party OS can have better support than the first party one 😅
It does feel counterintuitive but it kinda makes sense since it’s probably a small dev team.
The third party OS is being dogfooded and its devs probably use it on a daily basis, making minor improvements, it probably has different people working on a port for their own device, etc.
For a company that’s selling products, their time is split between fixing issues in the current OS, and building the next version of the OS for new phones
This is pretty sad to hear. Fairphone was next on my list of phones to try when my current phone gets too old. With the US boycott, I might have to go back to Samsung, but I hate the bloat.
why would you choose samsung, of all?
If you are looking for a device smaller than 155mm from at least 2023, you can choose between
- Google (subpar hardware)
- Xiaomi (don’t allow third-party launchers)
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo (subpar chipset)
- Sony (overpriced)
- Samsung
https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2023&nHeightMax=155&nRamMin=6000&idOS=2
After about 13 years of experience with a lot of Android phones, I’m never buying anything other than Google Pixels again. Every other manufacturer just fucks up the software so badly I can’t deal with it.
And no this is not an ad, I hate the state of Android atm, but it is what it is.
To each their own. My main issues with Google is the subpar chipset and the short battery life. Also the fact that you can’t remove the Google search bar from the Pixel launcher.
You can change the Google Search bar to another search engine, at least in Europe. You can’t remove it entirely, but I just tried it and I can set it to DuckDuckGo
To each their own, but not being able to just remove it just seems weird to me.
That’s a decent complaint, but making that a deciding factor for which smartphone to buy seems like shooting yourself in the food because the cheese was too orange-colored when choosing a sandwich
xiaomi doesn’t allow third party launchers anymore?? what a shitty change. since when is that?
also, I would rather have “subpar” hardware and a decent OS than trendy hardware and all the bloat and datamining of the world. but that honestly excludes most phones.
To be precise, Xiaomi OS allows you to change launchers, but you can’t use navigation gestures with them, you have to use the 3-buttons. It’s a deal breaker for quite a few people, and it’s a shame, because besides that the phones are great on paper.
The decision between the hardware and the OS is personal. I got a S23 recently because I wanted a smaller phone, it’s great so far.
I considered Pixels for a while, but on top of the subpar hardware the fact that you can’t remove the Google search bar from the Pixel launcher is still crazy to me.
I’ve had a Motorola 30 Fusion for a while, it’s a great device. If the Edge 50 Neo had a better chipset, that would have been my go-to.
you can’t remove the Google search bar from the Pixel launcher is still crazy to me.
yeah that’s crazy, but it’s relatively easy to fix compared to deep rooted bloat and whatnot in the system. the pixels even have good support for some alt ROMs, that can’t be told about most samsungs, so you are basically forced to use their software
I unbloated the S23 quite quickly, it’s not as bad as I thought it would be.
Pixels have indeed good support for alt ROMS (the grapheneOS support almost made me get one), but the battery issue seem to happen quite often:
https://old.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1jorwd3/battery_megathread_april_2025/mnybfar/
Using LineageOS on my FP4, so… 🤷
deleted by creator
I realize that I’m an asshole for telling them what to do but here’s what they need to do: They should drop all development of their own Android and put significant resources to making their next phone work with GrapheneOS.
they are already actively working with e/OS and iodéOS. Don’t know if e/OS already supports Android 15 like iodé does, but they could just focus on that next release…
That’d make them even more of a niche option than right now, since some apps (most notably banking) will just refuse to work.
On the contrary; many people want GrapheneOS but don’t want a Google phone.
Many do, and many want something else. Personally the uncertainty around banking apps working is what keeps me away from GrapheneOS.
Well, mine work. I haven’t found a single app that doesn’t.
Define most people
Lemmy isn’t exactly a great representation of the general populous
I said many
And, like I said, that’s a niche.
I’d love to use GrapheneOS myself, but unfortunately too many apps I need won’t work on it.
they could probably just extend it with the bits that google requires for corporate approval, and release that as a fork, while still contributing to the development of base graphene os.
I mean they don’t need to use plain graphene, a partnership could make things easier for both parties by avoiding needless duplication of efforts.
What most people don’t seem to understand is that every Android phone is a Google phone unless you go through the degooglification.
I would (and did) just use Apple phones if it weren’t for GrapheneOS.
By working with the real hardware vendor, they could apply for the certification, thus making the apps requiring the useless stamp from google work again.
Well, except for those apps that specifically tries to blacklist graphene. Looking at you, Revolut!
Most banking apps work with a simple app setting change
I’m one of the lucky ones, where Lloyds’ app will not work with GrapheneOS. At all.
Its kind of a pain in the ass, but ultimately its the only app, so its OK. The only other issue is the lack of NFC payment support for my bank card. But I have magsafe case and wallet, so carry my card with my phone.
I always been a bit skeptical of storing my credit card info on my phones, I still prefer keeping and using the actual card lol
And what simple setting is that? I have multiple apps that don’t work because their app developers use Google as the security verification, which is very common with banking apps.
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/8330-app-compatibility-with-grapheneos
Exploit protection compatibility mode worked for every app that didn’t work out of the box for me
That’s crazy. It didn’t work for any of the banking apps I tried it with. Maybe I’ll give it another try since it’s been a while.
https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/
Here’s more info on which apps are compatible, definitely worth double checking that all the ones you use are on the list
Thanks for all the info. I did some testing and a bunch of apps that didn’t work before are now working. Not everything, but a lot more than before.
Banking apps generally speaking work, it’s the NFC payments via google pay that don’t and probably never will.
That problem with that is the Graphene devs
Probably better to make something for the general population. If nothing else maybe work with Calyx OS or /e/os
Murena ships Fairphones with /e/os in the US
Agreed. Graphene is a fantastic product, but the devs are absolutely insufferable.
I’d heard about it as a secure, pro privacy ROM but never used it since it’s not available on my current device. But after seeing their attitude on some forums, it honestly put me right off ever wanting to try Graphene OS.
I’m glad it’s not just me
Even ignoring that I tried graphene but even as a tech person it was off putting. Calyx in contrast has a nice blend of usability and security imo.
I wanted to like graphene and it’s far superior in security but just so much less usable IMO. I’d rather move to a Linux phone at that point.
What do you mean by “much less usable”? It’s pretty much AOSP in terms of the UX, for better or worse.
Graphene doesn’t support MicroG which is a deal breaker for me
Well apparently their “approach” is to run sandboxed Google play. Now whether that is better than microg with its more anonymous nature but higher permission level, idk.
But that locks you into Google play and using an account of some sort rather than just using Aurora. From what I remember anyhow, especially when trying to use seedvault since graphene has no backup solution of its own even years after saying seedvault isn’t great.
No, the hardware of Fairphones lacks certain security features.
I was/am definitely considering fairphone as a full european alternative, however it seems they are also plagued by support issues and delays and pixels are still the best way to go, unfortunately.
If you’re comfortable with Custom ROMs, the Fairphone is still a fantastic alternative
If you’re not, then nothing-phone is british
I don’t get why people recommend nothing phone. They promise less years of software updates than most major brands and the best they do differently is “it’s sustainable”. Whatever that means.
How often do you really need the support, though? I don’t think I’ve ever needed it in >10 years of owning smart phones. I personally couldn’t be happier with the fairphone.
don’t get me wrong. it’s definitely on my top 2 , however getting timely android updates is nice and the improvements are nice to have. You don’t really need them and given current ai centered updates, I can’t say they are that meaningful anymore, however pixels have android 15 and will be getting 16 soon, with that whole DeX thingy, while fairphone is releasing statement about how they will skip 14, so their flagship is still on 13… Not great.
Imean my fp4 has ubuntu touch on it, still sad to see
