many, many do. what’s worse, to many of them that’s “the internet”, and when I offer them firefox, their complaint is that it does not show news articles…

oh, no, I don’t think so. it will result in the loud activists being shot down conveniently

what will it accomplish?

I feel like we might need to radicalize, in a sense, if you know what I mean.

but of course it won’t happen. because we’re not like them, and we can’t do that

all apps have their own processes, and the names of the processes were often the package name

how the fuck do they see that you have these apps?? Wasn’t it google’s justification for destroying /proc and all resource monitor apps with it that they have put querying of installed apps behind a permission?

forced to pay? Isn’t it a legal obligation to accept being enlisted?

I love how the preview text for youtube videos is entirely fucking useless

that sounds interesting, but in this idea would those people have to pay for the expenses of the eldely? in my understanding the problem is not that the elderly wouldn’t be able to take care for themselves generally, but that they wouldn’t be able to pay for things they need or want.

since this is most likely not a very popular add-on, any browser with it would stand out considerably more relative to not having it.

websites cannot look at the list of your addons. they have to detect the presence of each, which is mostly possible when the addon makes changes to the page content, or replaces browser APIs in certain ways.

Typically its common for browsers that want to reduce fingerprinting (tor, mullvad etc) recommend not installing new addons as then you stand out from crowd.

because if an addon does something that a website can detect, that’ll make you stand out

as I see both fewer and more is bad. more is bad because of overpopulation, but fewer is also bad because of how the pension system works at most places

I wanted to ask you how does such an extension make your browser more fingerprintable.

I’m still interested in an answer, but after looking at the code there’s a (actually not so) surprising turn: this thing sinply cannot live without remotely loaded google fonts (at addon startup) for some fucking reason.

that technically shouldn’t make you more fingerprintable, but the extension makes sure google is notified that you opened your browser.

yeah, they have other undiscovered vulnerabilities

then what is the popular food on the picture?

google’s fuckery would burn me out too

Clarification: syncthing was not discontinued, only the (3rd party) most popular android app for it was.

Unlikely. The maintainer was pushing updates more frequently and sooner than the original app. it’ll be fine

Otherwise, look into cryptomator. A completely different approach, it makes use of your existing cloud storage accounts, but at least more private then using those directly. It probably requires internet access all the time a file is accessed, though, but check the docs to be sure.

paper wasps are a popular food?

why would you want a browser based firmware flasher? the web browser should surely not deal with hardware. you don’t even get to know if the flashing code has changed, or verify it in Any way

I have already hated the grapheneos web flasher, even if its just made for those for whom themost basic computer terms area dufficult task, like download this file, type cmd into the start menu, press enter, paste this command text, press enter. but it could have been solved with a most simple gui executable too!

the largest problem with librewolf is the difficult pronunciation, I think, just as with forgejo. stonehawk is easy, as is not a terrible name either. maybe “stone” is not terribly interesting, though. but it still seems to be an improvement for me.

what is your take on it? why do you think it’s not better?