• BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    That will be awesome for when my body dies, but I still want to be a brain in a jar playing MechWarrior.

  • irish_link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are many reasons why I would take this over others. Many of those reasons have been pointed out in this thread. However there are many reasons why I say no. One small reason that will happen every year among many is will it have wifi 9?

    • DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      As far as I can see the company behind it (Starfish Neuroscience) is not affiliated with Valve in any way? (Aside from having the same CEO)

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be fair, I think it’s specifically Gabe who’s been obsessed with brain computer interfaces for the past many years. Obviously it’s his company, so Valve by extension participates.

      • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Makes sense, as you get older you get more and more disgusted by the weakness of your flesh, and tend to crave the certainty of steel.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Valve Deckard was a little more ambitious than had been originally anticipated.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    “has long toyed with the idea that your brain should be more connected to your PC”

    seems like billionaires’ wet dream to be honest

      • lucelu2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        We have all been “convinced” to carry tracking devices with us everywhere we go. Way cheaper than a brain implant.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like that vision of future (implants are cool, neural interfaces can be useful), but I’d also like our world to stop and think a bit at every stage.

    Solve the global network (note how I’m not saying “global computer network”, because I don’t think so, ideally we’d still have global analog commutated channel network as the base level), web of hypertext documents, universal applications and personal computing problems sufficiently well first. Then go to brain implants.

    It’s like combat drones, using them with optical cables for communication is better than with radio, turns out. That’s the current way.

    Would be good if for computing we’d figure out ways better than war to remove delusions.

  • TomB19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I want to get one of the first implants possible. VR headsets are so unsightly.

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m only doing the brain chip thing if it can fully transplant me to a Matrix level of simulated reality and get me out of this current hellhole permanently.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    "Alright, the implantation surgery was a success, now all we have to do is fire up the remote activation. Throwing the switch in three… two…