• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s exactly a security concern from a design point of view. Your desire to trivialize it doesn’t change its nature. That’s not what DNS is for and making it do that is going to cause everyone regret.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          “I want people to accept a bogus solution so this will all just go away.” Okay? But surely you can appreciate that people are not likely to be moved by your bad faith suggestions.

          • मुक्त@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.

            Or I am missing some design problem here?