• lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Either that or fish aren’t a phylogenetic group. You decide

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can’t evolve out of a clade, or so they say.

        Of course it’s not helpful to call humans and whales fishes in common parlance. But in phylogenetics, why not?

        • lugal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because that would make fish and vertebrates synonyms so why not drop the former altogether?

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Words can mean more than one thing thought, and depending on the context it can be useful to convey the fact that the vertebrates all evolved from fish-like ancestors, or that whales are more closely related to some fish than those fish are related to other fish.