The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California, an effort that could begin as soon as Friday, according to multiple sources.

Agencies are being told to start identifying grants the administration can withhold from California. Sources said the administration is specifically considering a full termination of federal grant funding for the University of California and California State University systems.

Singling out one state for massive cuts would be an unusual move, but Donald Trump has long made Democratic-led California a target.

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    if state funding is being canceled, that state should leave the union. why be apart of the united states government if trump is dismantling and destroying the united states government.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The American thing to do is fight for America.

      The people who want California to just leave are the ones who want to dismantle the country.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it maybe time to change the dynamic of the USA. Maybe instead of 2 levels, maybe three. Federal, regional, and state. Where the federal hands over some powers to the regional government. I am not sure how that could happen, but it might be a good direction.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I personally think that there should be three presidents, each overseeing a major chunk of America - West, Center, and East. This would help divide up the power of the executive branch, as the Judicial and Congressional branches would remain a global aspect of the nation. Unitary executive theory would be dead, since there can be no unitary, IMO.

          Plus, we can have three separate elections - someone who ran to be elected in Centre America can’t run for the other two regions. This would allow us to have a lot more candidates, all of them quite focused on what they offer the region they decided to run for. Right now, a president has to appeal to ALL of America, which means not many people will actually be happy.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t want what’s best for America. I want what’s best for California. It’s in a bad relationship and is always the provider and the victim.

        Without liberty and justice for all, there can BE no one nation indivisible.

        • j0ester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dude, this all blue states. We always help the poorly uneducated… and always get fucked on. Those leaders don’t even say thank you, or even wear a suit.

      • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The people who want California to just leave are the ones who want to dismantle the country.

        This Canadian is fine with it at this point. Fuck the USA. We’ve been your friend forever and you shit on us.

        Burn baby burn.

      • valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 months ago

        Correct. But what you may have implied and got wrong is that this is somehow a bad idea. America is long overdue for a federal collapse. This cultural infighting is unsustainable.

        As a new Yorker I am sick of having my tax dollars go to subsidize hicks in the deep south and Midwest that ultimately vote against my rights. I am more than happy to see the bridges that unite us burn because the concept of “unity” in a melting pot is a ticking time bomb, as it always has been.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m Californian. The federal government, for my entire life, has just taken and taken and taken from me. I have received nothing in return. I don’t need your shitty union of thugs and mouth breathers, and I don’t need your bullshit military colonizing waste of time and money.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well you probably don’t realize the things the federal government does give cali. Interstate highways are one. Coast guard. Bridges. And clearly funding to the universities. Now the balance is lopsided, in that cali gives more back. But that doesn’t mean cali would have given you those same things.
          That said… determining if CA would be better with our without the feds is a complicated question. For one, they would probably need to fund thier own military, as they would be a ripe target given thier economic prosperity.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We pay more into those federal programs than they spend back on us. If we just kept the taxes locally, while maintaining funding for all those programs, we would come out ahead by a factor of nearly 2:1.

            As for military spending, there is a lot of savings to be had by not fighting endless bullshit Christian jihads.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              So you missed my point. Many of those things that the feds pay for just wouldn’t happen if the state was paying. Politics is tricky like that.

                • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The more local the governing body, the more they have to pacify the not in my backyard people. The federal government can generally ignore those people and just make things that need to happen, happen.

              • DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s not a matter of the state taking over things, the federal government is (hypothetically) stopping those funds regardless of what they do, so why wouldn’t they fund it themselves because all those things you mentioned still need to happen.

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    the only people who want California to secede are tech freaks that want to establish a monarchy and see this as an opportunity to do that

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    these stupid fucks love pissing in the wind for all of us to see

    go on then ya citrus scrotum, show us once more how brilliant and clever you are

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    The ICE raids are meant to cause the response we are seeing, and eventually an even more powerful response. The White House has already been throwing around the word insurrection, which implies the insurrection act. If the natural escalation that they expect takes place, it could create the conditions where the insurrection act can be invoked. Since the Federal level is under control of the Trump Administration, that leaves the National Guard, state police, county sheriffs, and local police departments. The only one of these capable of standing up to the Feds would be the National Guard. If things turn ugly over the next few weeks during continued raids in places like L.A., it could force the Governor to deploy the national guard given the numbers of people involved. Some of these communities are well armed and they are already fighting back. If the goal is to cause the conditions to invoke the insurrection act, it would take away the ablity of the California Governor to direct his national guard. They can be forced to follow the orders of the President, which is one of the reasons for using the Insurrection Act in the first place.

    In a place like L.A., this leaves just the LAPD and Sherrifs department and they do not have the power to stop both the Feds and a national guard under White House control. L.A. seems to be heavily targeted by the Trump administration in many different ways. They are looking at bribery and corruption in many areas like LA Homeless Agency. The ICE raids targeted the Fashion District are meant as an economic attack, as many of those people worked in shops and factories. Other ICE raids targeted companies involved in agriculture. The Trump admin is also looking at other Federal funding to take away from California.

    All of this combined could mean that the state Government, state and local police cannot protect these communities from what is being sent after them, partially as an overall form of economic warfare against California generally. You have the wildfire funds, the tariffs attacking the shipping areas of coastal California, and it’s obvious that it is a well planned operation. Behind this too is a hostile DOJ and FBI, not to mention DHS, ICE, and everyone else. They are being hunted.

    The State Government can’t protect anyone either, they have been totally outmanuvered at every stage, because they are just coasting until 2026. The one advantage people have is their numbers. Peaceful protest is the way forward, it just takes a lot more people knowing about the raids and being present to protest them. If the Trump admin wants a Kent state or Tiananmen Square type situation on their hands, that will be on them…

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow, so I thought I was fucked when I had “California secedes” on my bingo card

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    How about California cancelling paying federal taxes in turn? This would probably lead to a big loss for the federal budget, wouldn’t it?

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Aren’t there a fuckload of Republicans in wine country?

    I doubt they’ll be happy about that

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    So Americans need to switch it off and on again. Gather up new founding fathers and mothers, write up a new constitution and declaration of independence - write up documents for a new federation between states…

    Create a back up United States. Declare the old one null and void. Stop interacting with the old one. Start interacting with the new one.

    Call all this something benign sounding. Try not to go to war about it. But yeah, you all need to switch this shit off and on again.

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except that’s exactly what the Heritage Foundation has been wanting for decades so they can turn the US into an official Christofascist nation.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, by excluding the south east (Texas to Florida) they could easily reboot it in a much more progressive manner.

        • BreakerSwitch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Woah woah woah. Texas seceded from Mexico to preserve slavery until they joined the US so they could secede to preserve slavery. And a cuba libre is delicious, not nearly as watered down (underwater) as Florida is.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the federal government isn’t going to give California back the federal taxes paid by its citizens then it should stop paying federal taxes.

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have NO clue what the legal ramifications are here. If it’s not, that would seem like a next step.

          • seemefeelme@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Please do, California. I want to visit again and I’m not looking to get sent to El Salvador on arrival lol

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m going to be fucking shook if Gavin actually does it. So far, the only people I’ve seen him meaningfully stand up to are bay area NIMBYs and homeless people.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          millbrae made a fuss like a year-2 ago about some housing/location being built for the poor. guess who the nimbys are, all rich white people(i saw the video of them whining). Poc dont make a fuss with others around, i ever only seen caucasian people do it. remember the white flight in the bay, now its regentrifying. we did a whole talk/project about gentrification in the area in one of my courses.

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah. I’m out here fighting the NIMBYs in my city, they’re almost all older white dudes, not even that wealthy by California standards. It was super cool to see Newsom twist their arm like that, way less cool to see him bulldoze the homeless afterward.

        • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t see how he could since individuals pay income tax directly to the federal government during tax season. It would take all of them working in unison to do it. Unless there’s some other tax payment directly from CA state that I don’t know about.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Taxes are collected through the private for-profit banking system in a manner that’s completely disjointed from the state of residency. Payroll taxes are incredibly efficient, with north of a 98% collections rate, for this reason. The private banks need the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve needs the US Treasury. So when the US Treasury says it’s taking a vig on your employer’s deposit at Bank of America or Citigroup or even your local Credit Union, compliance is instant and unquestioning.

        Going Unbanked is one way to get around this. But without an employer who is operating on the same wavelength and willing to play ball, unbanking yourself is difficult and expensive and fraught with criminal liabilities.

        So, the short answer is that there’s no (practical) way for a State Government to intervene on Federal income tax collection. Not when all the transactions are taking place in a server farm hosted in a NYC boiler room, anyway.

      • acchariya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        The state of California could implement say, an 80% state income tax. This would be deductable from federal tax per IRS tax code. The state could then create an instant tax credit to credit back a gross 69% income, leaving 11% to the state to match their current tax rate.

        The Feds would only get tax on 20% of wages, unlike the 89% they do now

        • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Individuals don’t typically pay taxes themselves. They get deducted from paychecks. Employers do this before we even get paid. So companies would need to support this. But then you have some like my employer who has hundreds of people in California but is based in another state. How is that going to work? This just isn’t as easy as residents just deciding not to.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Okay. I didnt know this. I’ve never actually paid taxes myself.

            But it’s also possible other states get on board, and i know domestic industries like cannabis that dont do business with the maij body of the empire play it pretty fast abd loose with taxes.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You will lose against the IRS. The only way this works is if everyone acts together. You cannot beat Uncle Sam alone.

        • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          i’m gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you there. its been easy as hell to cheat on your taxes for a long time. extremely easy to invent stuff and end up owing 0. not as easy for them to actually check. especially not now.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        First pretty dumb to say this publicly if true… But second: you do realize that the rules about paying taxes literally, only apply to people like you and I? They 100% will continue to go after low hanging fruit, and that means people who can’t afford a team of attorneys on retainer.