Fifteen years ago, smack in the middle of Barack Obama’s first term, amid the rapid rise of social media and a slow recovery from the Great Recession, a professor at the University of Connecticut issued a stark warning: the United States was heading into a decade of growing political instability.

It sounded somewhat contrarian at the time. The global economy was clawing back from the depths of the financial crisis, and the American political order still seemed anchored in post-Cold War optimism — though cracks were beginning to emerge, as evidenced by the Tea Party uprising. But Peter Turchin, an ecologist-turned-historian, had the data

“Quantitative historical analysis reveals that complex human societies are affected by recurrent—and predictable—waves of political instability,” Turchin wrote in the journal Nature in 2010, forecasting a spike in unrest around 2020, driven by economic inequality, “elite overproduction” and rising public debt.

Now, with the nation consumed by polarization in the early months of a second Donald Trump presidency, institutional mistrust at all-time highs, and deepening political conflict, Turchin’s prediction appears to have landed with uncanny accuracy.

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean that was right around, or maybe a bit after the tea party movement got started. If you follow that group you see how the ideology infected the republican party and led to Trump. The policies the tea party pushed are basically 1-to-1 with Trumps.

    All of it is effectively snake oil politicians using hard times to convince Americans to act against their best interests.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    It didn’t sound contrarían to those of us paying attention to the economics, in addition to the social policies. DAE remember the Obama Bear cartoons? "Obama! Obama!”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Did he mention how long it would take? Because it’s somehow happening too slowly and way too fast at the same time.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Strauss–Howe Generational Theory (not SDT from the article) predicts the current Crisis Era will end around 2033. For reference, the last Crisis Era ran from 1929-1946. But whether the US/democracy is still in one piece on the other side is yet to be determined.

      The only claim they make is that,

      According to Strauss and Howe, the first turning is a high, which occurs after a crisis. During the high, institutions are strong and individualism is weak. Society is confident about where it wants to go collectively, though those outside the majoritarian center often feel stifled by conformity.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I’m 46 and shooting for a heart attack by 50, like my grandfather. My dad’s 74 though so I’m worried my life will drag on past that and I’ll have to deal with deteriorating mental faculties. Dying isn’t the bad part - it’s the slow descent into senility that worries me.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        1985: The further adventures of lobotomized Winston Smith!

        … its 270 pages Smith staring at a poster of Big Brother, just endless, baseless, internal monologue poetry about how wonderful he is… with very occasional intrusions of reality that, overtime, make it clear he is actually in something between a set and a cell, and the ‘cafe’ keeps serving him drugged tea and coffee.