• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Shout out to the dingus who namedropped OP and sighed about criticizing tankies, ‘with cause,’ ‘this time.’

    You’re so close. You can almost see the shape of it. Maybe… the labels we use… apply… to real things?

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, I love ignoring those guys! Drives them up the wall when I don’t acknowledge them.

      little do they know I’m in their private chatrooms, hoho!

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That me! What labels are we talking about here, that tankies and by extension hexbear et al are transphobic?

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Tankie.” A label hexbear often denies as relevant to anyone or anything, or proclaims as good somehow… interchangeably.

            You witnessed someone with such brain rot - someone important and influential, even! - that they insist gender is a western psyop. And you still can’t recognize criticism of that brain rot, unless we all think you have stupid conclusions about the exact same things. Nah dude. Y’all just say dumb shit for dumb reasons, so long as you can blame capitalism somehow. That is what makes you tankies. You have some opinion that is so detached from reality, it can only be explained as assembling leftist buzzwords into an argument-shaped sentence.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              The most common criticism Ive seen is that “Tankie” is very abitrary and ill-defined. That it’s just used as an insult, which your second paragraph confirms. There is no substantive criticism you just hate us.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                ‘You make bad arguments for bad reasons, in a predictable pattern.’

                ‘La la la not listening you juuust hate us.’

                Like that.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  you are stupid and make bad arguments for bad reasons in a predictable pattern, no I will not elaborate, you’ll just have to take my statement as fact.

                  Why are you ignoring me?