Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agoWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down10
arrow-up1117arrow-down1imageWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 months agoYeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·8 months agoAs long as AI = 0 it works
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 months agoUnfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoTrue. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.
Yeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
As long as AI = 0 it works
Unfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
I is 0, as it is nonexistent
True. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.