A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You underestimate the demands on a surgeon’s body to perform surgery. This makes it much less prone to tiredness, mistakes, or even if the surgeon is physically incapable in any way of continuing life saving surgery

    • nevetsg@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have seen enough ER to know that operating theatre staff work as a team. So I consider this would be a good thing.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If we go by that logic, some worker from your supermarket should be able to do surgeries

    Doctors have to learns this much so they can handle most really unusual stuff, not because they have to know this for a standard surgery.

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    so theoretically they could make sex bots and train them on… so they perform ‘unflappably’!

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s ridiculous. Everyone knows that for a robot to perform an operation like this safely, it needs human-written code and a LiDAR.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it were the only option, I’d gladly take it.

      I rely on robots to do a lot of other things in my life, directly and indirectly.

      Well, not many directly. But machines, definitely.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah it’s not like I refuse to drive my car because it wasn’t handcrafted by a human.

        It is an electrical fault on four wheels, but that’s just because it’s old.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They obviously don’t feel comfortable with the robot doing surgery on humans just yet either which is why they’re not actually suggesting doing that yet. It will have to go through years and years of certification before that’s even considered.

      I’m sure most surgeries will still be conducted by humans but there are situations where one of these would be extremely helpful. Any situation where a surgeon isn’t currently accessible and can’t quickly get there. Remote communities, Disaster relief, Arctic research facilities, Starships trapped in the Delta quadrant, War zones, Ships at sea.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hold on 3P0…you gotta little piece of human stuff stuck on your right end effector clamp top hinge pin. There, all good! Continue!

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not fair. A robot can watch videos and perform surgery but when I do it I’m called a “monster” and “quack”.

    But seriously, this robot surgeon still needs a surgeon to chaperone so what’s being gained or saved? It’s just surgery with extra steps. This has the same execution as RoboTaxis (which also have a human onboard for emergencies) and those things are rightly being called a nightmare. What separates this from that?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Naturally as this kind of thing moves into use on actual people it will be used on the wealthiest and most connected among us in equal measure to us lowly plebs right…right?

    • brown567@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you kidding!? It’ll be rolled out to poor people first! (gotta iron out the last of the bugs somehow)

      • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You really don’t understand modern medical bullshit. The rich will be all over this, just like AI, Just like NFTs just like every bullshit thing that comes up they get roped into by a flashy salesman

        • brown567@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh yeah, I’ve been successfully propagandized into thinking rich people became rich through merit, I forgot how many of them are complete morons XD

          Thanks for reminding me

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maybe we could install a murder mode switch.

            Perhaps an algorithm where its effectiveness is inversely proportionate to your bank account.