• WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    “All these porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists so desperate to get their hands on rape-my-little-sister incest games they’re now exchanging clues on how to find them so that they don’t all die overnight,” Collective Shout co-founder Melinda Tankard Reist tweeted on July 18th.

    She sounds deranged.

    i wonder what her own perversion is. It’s likely quite disturbing - nobody has that much anger and scorn over other people’s sex lives and a healthy sex life of their own.

      • WatDabney@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I did think her use of a first person pronoun there was a bit odd, but I didn’t put that together. You might be onto something.

    • Noja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      Looking at porn doesn’t mean you have a porn addiction. It’s also not unhealthy. Playing a porn game also doesn’t mean you have a porn addiction. It’s only an addiction if it affects your life negatively. Porn gives one pleasure and more pleasure is objectively a good thing, unless it affects you in a bad way, like certain kinds of drugs.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not only does it make it so people have unrealistic expectation in bed That’s more due to shitty sex ed. A good instructor will state clearly that porn isn’t realistic.

          but also there are always victims in porn and the porn industry is full of human trafficking “Always” is a big stretch here. Does it happen? Yes. But not always. And it’s better handled through industry regulation than outright banning. All banning would do is drive it underground and make it even more exploitative

        • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you generate expectations from what you see in media they are always going to be unrealistic regardless of what it is. Every industry has its share of scum but you cant throw it all out because of bad people doing bad things. The fault lies within those people not the industry.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Porn is definitely unhealthy

      Look at all the countries which block / ban porn.

      Now look at women’s rights in those same countries.

      I’ll let you draw your own conclusions.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s literally research done on that & it only means porn for men will get banned.

        • Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So many of them end up doing this kind of thing because they need money and stuff and never wanted to do it in the first place.

          You just described most people doing most jobs.

          Pretty sure most people wouldn’t work in whatever job they have if they didn’t need the money.

          Likewise, there’s many who likely prefer doing porn over working in fast food or retail. After all, in one you get demeaned, mistreated, even abused, and in the other you get to orgasm for money.

          Also if you really think women undressing and doing porn for the pleasure of the men

          Way to just say that women and LGBT+ don’t like porn.

          Says a lot more about you than anything else you’ve said, bigot.

          PS: when the correlation is extremely strong and repeatable, it usually implies causation. There’s already research that proves that link isn’t just correlation. Not that it seems you’re actually interested in data or good faith discussion.

          • Gloomy@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            You just described most people doing most jobs.

            If your job is honestly comparable to that of a reluctant sex worker, you really need to switch jobs.

            Pretty sure most people wouldn’t work in whatever job they have if they didn’t need the money.

            Likewise, there’s many who likely prefer doing porn over working in fast food or retail. After all, in one you get demeaned, mistreated, even abused, and in the other you get to orgasm for money.

            This is a completly wrong conceptualization. Porn “stars” often are often locked into filming increasingly extreme and often increasingly violent content. Many are left back traumatized for life.

            See, for example, this study.

            This article challenges the consumer-centric view of pornography, which overlooks the exploitation and abuse of individuals documented in its production. The lack of conceptual clarity surrounding the nature of pornography obscures these abuses, leading to significant consequences for those affecte

            Way to just say that women and LGBT+ don’t like porn.

            About 70% of consumers are men.

            when the correlation is extremely strong and repeatable, it usually implies causation. There’s already research that proves that link isn’t just correlation. Not that it seems you’re actually interested in data or good faith discussion.

            Op might or might not be, but i am. Please feel free to back up your claim with data.

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              If your job is honestly comparable to that of a reluctant sex worker, you really need to switch jobs.

              Spoken like someone who’s never struggled.

              This is a completly wrong conceptualization. Porn “stars” often are often locked into filming increasingly extreme and often increasingly violent content. Many are left back traumatized for life.

              This isn’t the 90s. OnlyFans creators aren’t beholden to an agency, which the paper you linked to mentions about.

              About 70% of consumers are men.

              30% is still pretty damn big, especially in context of how many human adults there are. That’s still a potential of over a billion people by rough estimate based off a set of 4 billion.

              Please feel free to back up your claim with data.

              Looking through the comments here, it seems you already have been, but still don’t care.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sir: If it’s illegal, please notify the authorities. If it’s not illegal, then I’ll have to politely ask you to fuck off.

        • Gloomy@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That logic falls apart real fast. Hitting children, for example. Legal, but is it right?

          Some places have legal laws that are horrifying. You can see the other implementation of your logic there. Like, is being gay a bad thing, as long as it is illegal?

          • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have no obligation to follow your moral compass - which is nothing more than your opinion. The only common denominator binding both of us, is codified law.

            • Gloomy@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ah, the german approach (used mainly between 1934 and 1945) 😉

  • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s a very bad and weird choice of words. Other than that, banning rape-games is not a bad idea, especially from mainstream platforms, though i guess it’s not the biggest problem for women’s rights right now.

  • Chris Lowles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t know how Collective Shout aren’t seen as more of a pariah group here like Westboro Baptist Church are in America.

  • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Alright, time to research and rat these idiots out. The fact that they tried to ban Detroit: Become Human is enough for me to know that they’re not gamers at all and are just cookers.

    • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m trying to follow the money and can’t find much but there are very strong ties to the Christian/Baptist community, which means that there is an above 0% chance that Advance Australia has or is providing funding.

      Their partners and partner’s partners are anti-sex (such as CATWA who believe that all prostitution is not a job but is a form of sex trafficking and appears to be against the sex industry), anti-abortion, and all board members and their associated partners are very painfully white.

      There’s also an association with the NCJWA, whose president appears to be pro Zionist and has lauded Jillian Segal as a voice of moral clarity (anti-semetic envoy for government pushing to reduce protest rights, husband made a $50k donation to Advance Australia).

      Hilariously, one of their partners is called ‘Campaign Against Sex Robots’.

      Anyway, in summary, this appears to be a very well funded right wing puritan religious group whose only games experiences are in the political realm rather than PC.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago
    Collective shout finacials
    year: 2024
    revenue: 458043
    employee_expenses: 107000
    other_expenses: 215488
    net_surplus: 135555
    employees: 
      total_fte: 2
      full_time: 0
      part_time: 1
      casual: 4
    volunteers: 15
    donations_and_bequests: 389800
    government_grants: 0
    commercial_income: 0
    expense_to_revenue_ratio: "70.4%"
    average_expense_per_employee: 39400
    
    Leadership
    - name: Melinda Tankard Reist
      role: Founder, Movement Director
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @MelTankardReist
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Caitlin Roper
      role: Campaigns Manager
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Renee Chopping
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - LinkedIn
      public_email_address: r******@collectiveshout.org
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Lyn Swanson Kennedy
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Coralie Alison
      role: Movement Operations Manager
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @CoralieAlison
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Im personally tired of all this incest shit everywhere so I’m down for it.

    • Ebber@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the wrong way to go about it though. Private companies should not dictate legality and morality.

      • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t mind if Valve did. It’s the unaccountable payment processors deciding morality that’s spooky, because there’s no meaningful alternative.

        • Ebber@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh yeah, I agree. That is what I meant to meant to say. The payment processors are acting like a cartel here.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’d be kind of funny if some rep from steam just came out and said, ‘Wait, the Aussies wanted this? Put it all back! Add on a few more new ones even. This won’t stand.’

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    All I wanna know is how fucked up and perverted the porn that they watch is. Anyone taking this hard of a stand against something surely must be projecting.

  • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    People are blaming Collective Shout but crazy lobbying groups have always existed. Visa and Mastercard are solely responsible for acquiescing. Maybe it’s time we stop caring so much what people on the political extremes have to say?