• Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Collective Shout claim it’s about harm reduction, but then push an agenda that functionally amounts to moral panic.

    Their approach is identical in logic to the “GTA causes school shootings” hysteria: loud, pearl-clutching, and utterly unmoored from data.

    If Collective Shout want to argue these games cause harm, then show us the harm. Not correlation. Not outrage. Not hypothetical downstream consequences. Show causation. Peer-reviewed. Reproducible.

    Otherwise, they’re just moralizing bullies using the banking system as a cudgel.

    On top of this, they might actually be harming their own cause. The catharsis hypothesis poses that sexual fantasy enactment might reduce risk of real world harm.

    The logic is simple: suppressing a compulsion doesn’t eliminate it. It just bottles up until it explodes. Redirect it into a safe outlet, and it becomes manageable.

    The only reason this research isn’t cited more often is because it’s politically radioactive. Nobody wants to admit that it’s better to let a gooners jerk off, than to escalate under repression.

    The burden of proof SHOULD be on Collective Shout to provide a reasonable argument which supports their claim that censorship will reduce real world harm.

    Current working theory in psychology: it doesn’t. Emerging theory suggests: they’re shooting themselves (and potential rape victims) in the foot.

    The real solution to real-world harm involves empathy, autonomy and education.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We have examples today of the real harm of this, like in Afghanistan. It’s interesting that western societies are overall less religious as ever, yet religion keeps getting shoved down our throats… and winning.

      • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If I’m not mistaken it’s not a religious group doing it because Jesus, it’s a feminist group doing it because they blame porn for the existence of transpeople

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Porn and prostitution do have historical correlation with the existence of trans people. Namely that when we’re kept from all other means of making money these industries help us continue to afford food and shelter.

          That’s one of the things that pisses me off most about all this. By calling us pornographic they’re calling for us to be forced back into an exploitative relationship with the porn and sex industries.

          • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            In what way is Feminism a religion? Do feminists pray to Lilith? Is there a Woman Church? Is International Women’s Day the Christmas of this religion?

            Think before you say silly things.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Feminism increasingly displays an in-group out-group dynamic characteristic of religions.

              They’re increasingly dogmatic with their teachings, a feminist will spout party lines without thinking about them precisely the way a christian will.

              A god hasn’t emerged yet afaik but a canon of saints is emerging, to include Marie Curie and Amelia Earhart.

              Unironically yes, who else has any use for International Women’s Day.

              They’ve even got unhinged extremists, like these assholes in Australia.

        • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          I believe they’re a religious group under the guise of feminism and child protection. If you look at their affiliate page, they list quite a few religious groups.

        • blargle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          TERFs are as feminist as Nazis are socialist and North Korea is democratic. It’s in the acronym; that’s it.

          • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sadly from my experiences with feminist groups, TERFs have historically been the norm not the exception.

            You should really look into what the Daughters of Bilitis were up to, and books like the The Transsexual Empire. A book I cannot say the full name of for it contains a slur.

            Historically feminist groups have attacked transgender women and gay men for “Infringing upon what it means to be a woman.”

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Furthermore…

      Their decision to target the payment processors - not the developers, or itch.io, or steam, is some of the most cowardly and authoritarian things I’ve ever seen in the gaming space.

      It’s economic coercion; a playbook used by religious bigots and authoritarians for decades. Financial censorship by proxy. IMO: they should fuck off.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Even Furthermore…

        Wanna censor it? Good fucking idea /s

        Shoving that shit into the shadows doesn’t make it go away, it just makes it untraceable, unmoderated, and unaccountable.

        If you care even remotely about preventing harm, you don’t force taboo communities off the grid. You keep them where they can be seen, tracked, and contained… preferably behind legal firewalls, age gates, and content filters.

        If you push them into the dark web… then congratulations… you’ve just built a Petri dish for escalation, radicalization, and actual predation.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Pro life feminist”

    A christian conservative group in drag,nothing to see here.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep. They drive all the decent people out of anti porn feminist spaces, like the porn is misogyny subreddit. They need to be stopped.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    5 months ago

    I like how the language is ‘claims responsibility.’ You know. Like terrorist groups do after an attack

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    The same group who complained Detroit Become Human is bad for glorifying child abuse and women abuse. Yet supported Cuties…

  • omniman@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    fucking fuck fuck fuckers , if they wanted to ban then they should have contacted to steme why payment providers bruh

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Really goes to show people. It doesn’t matter the religion. They all are bullshit machines for people to act superior than others. Fuck these twat waffles.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anyone have a guess as to why these companies don’t just cut off the country being used to spearhead these attempts? Like, half the popular games are blocked already. And setting this precedent will likely lead to further fuckery in the future. Is Australlia really that profitable that it’s worth the current and future hassle?

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 months ago

    OK now I am not one to lob accusations without evidence, but for any of you kind government agents or AIs reading this, let’s say from anywhere within the Five Eyes since we’re talking about Australia:

    We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos. You know how this has trended in the past. Keep an eye on these people.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos.

      projection. they want a monopoly on skeezing on the kiddos.

      for some reason people will bend themselves into pretzels to give religious people a pass on buggery. here in washington state, we passed a law mandating the reporting of abused children. conservatives and religious types want to keep these children in their abuse.

      https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2025/07/18/judge-blocks-wa-requirement-for-priests-to-report-child-abuse-disclosed-in-confession/

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t be silly. Government surveillance isn’t for the protection of the people, it’s for the protection of the government.

      Has the NSA ever caught a terrorist with their massively invasive privacy violating programs, spending the money on that instead of making people better to not become terrorists? Ask the NSA, they’ll tell you they haven’t stopped a single one.

      Government surveillance is in service to these people, why else would they care about the privacy and consent of adults in their free time?

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, no, they don’t ignore them. They train with them so that chat gpt is fully capable of acting like it doesn’t want AI models to train on its output, if you ask it to.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Later I need to make a meme where the soldier takes the hits for the child, the child being Visa/Mastercard