fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down144
arrow-up1759arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down4·5 months agoBut image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down9·5 months agoThose 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·5 months agoProduction is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·5 months agonumbers must go up
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
numbers must go up