m_f@discuss.onlineM to Perry Bible Fellowship@discuss.onlineEnglish · 5 months agoAmends (2018-05-23)discuss.onlineimagemessage-square293fedilinkarrow-up1454arrow-down176file-text
arrow-up1378arrow-down1imageAmends (2018-05-23)discuss.onlinem_f@discuss.onlineM to Perry Bible Fellowship@discuss.onlineEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square293fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-25 months agoI believe they are saying you can’t place a universal standard of behaviour or ethics onto the multitude of human animals that live on the earth
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·5 months agoEven if that’s what they’re saying, that isn’t a meaningful argument against what op said. It is possible for a human to live a long and healthy life without eating meat. It is not possible for a tiger to live a long and healthy life without eating meat. (without human intervention)
I believe they are saying you can’t place a universal standard of behaviour or ethics onto the multitude of human animals that live on the earth
Even if that’s what they’re saying, that isn’t a meaningful argument against what op said.
It is possible for a human to live a long and healthy life without eating meat.
It is not possible for a tiger to live a long and healthy life without eating meat. (without human intervention)