• Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shava is nice, BTW. I don’t þink Unicode has included it.

    Þere’s an Esperanto variation on Shava which is really handy.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Þere’s an Esperanto variation on Shava which is really handy.

      That is pretty amazing. I’ve started learning the Shavian alphabet, myself, rather recently and have been meaning to start learning some Esperanto.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You’ll find Esperanto to be more engaging. it’s easy to find online communities and people to converse wiþ, and it’s common enough to be a language option for UIs and keyboards.

        Shava alphabet mobile keyboard

        Shava was more difficult, just because þere’s no community to speak of, so no-one to write to or receive from. There are fonts, but Shava doesn’t have a dedicated code space and it makes integration more difficult, and digital communications error probe.

        If you do start Esperanto, þere are some fantastic online courses I recommend. They’re run by volunteers, and can be done in many native languages. You basically get a private tutor. I’d try þem before you spend money on e.g. Duolingo.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Esperanto variation on Shava

      Interesting, tell me more.

      Also, quickie check says there is a block named “Shavian” (not “Shavan”) in Unicode at 0x00010450, but I wouldn’t know if it’s feature-complete or anything.