• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    261
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Having used both, doesn’t 11 have the same level of ads as 10 did? It seems like it’s really only OneDrive ads if you don’t use it if anything?

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Maybe? I just said in another comment that I am pretty much exclusively Linux. I only occasionally use a W10 VM at work, and it’s enterprise/LTSB so I don’t get a lot of that junk.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          100 point top thread based on the second and third hand opinions of a Windows non-user really sums up the quality of this discussion lol

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve lost count of the amount of posts and comment threads on here about “all the horrible ads and spyware” where the solution was to flip literally a single switch in Settings, Personalization.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They’ve been adding spyware and ads into W10 so it’s not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.

        IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.

        • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          Windows 11 has more spyware and its more ens***tificated

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes but that could be added in a W10 update just like they’ve already done with previous W10 updates.