Of course it’s not, and anyone thinking so is a fool, but it’s funny. It’s a shitposting community, the post fits the bill imo.
Of course it’s not, and anyone thinking so is a fool, but it’s funny. It’s a shitposting community, the post fits the bill imo.
Thank you for your explanation !
It feels a bit silly to have evidences kept away when they could speed up the process, or even change the very outcome of it…
Also glad that the judge is not a morron can see how it would be important for the elections.
Can anyone explain to me what makes this trial “special”?
As in: In what kind of trial do you have to UNSEAL evidences ?
Should they not all be brought up to the court as soon as they are available to have a fair trial ? Why is the defendant even able to ask for the evidence to not be used ? I’m struggeling to make sens of this…
Make politicians afraid to start their cars again.
I’m sorry ? WHAT ? This is so fucked up…