Should Greece really be on that list? The only criterion where it’s not grayed out is “Awarded Parts of China to Japan”, which actually means “signed the Treaty of Versailles after WWI”. And unlike many of the other countries that signed it, Greece did not get anything to itself from it.

This may be the first confirmed case, but it’s probably not a good idea to make it the poster case for pro-choice. Let’s look at the facts:

• She was pregnant with twins, and wanted an abortion.
• She couldn’t legally do it in her home state Georgia, so she had to travel to North Carolina and get abortion pills there.
• A few days later, when she was already back home, she started to suffer from severe complications.
• The doctors in Georgia could not legally perform the procedure that could have saved her life - a surgical removal of what remained of the fetus - because it was to close to abortion.

The article says the clinic in North Carolina could have performed that procedure, but does not state why she was not brought there. Maybe her condition was too bad for the long travel? Maybe she was evacuated to the nearest hospital (a decision which does, generally, make a lot of sense) which could not have signed her away for an illegal (by Georgian law) operation outstate? Maybe it was medically and legally possible to drive/fly her there, but it was too expensive for her? Either way - it is clear that the ban on abortions in Georgia (made possible “thanks” to the Roe vs Wade overruling) is the direct reason why she could not get the treatment which could have save her life.

BUT!

The pro-life camp can easily pin this on the abortion pills, claiming that a nation-wide abortion bad would have prevented her from receiving them and therefore would have prevented her death (and the aborted twins’ death. They won’t forget to include that)

Anarchy is not against rules, it’s against rulers.

If someone blows all four of your tires in one car, you can use the spare plus the spare from each of the other three.

That would explain so much about the traffic…

So if you don’t sell it, and instead rent it out to other people, he’d get a portion of the rent the future tenant pays? And I don’t supposed said future tenant will also get equity?

Have you consulted with a lawyer about this? The laws differ from place to place, but I’d be worried the equity you give him may also grant him some sort of claim on the house, which would mean he gets a say on financial things related to the real estate. This can complicate things in the future.

Also - what does “percentage of revenue if we end up keeping and paying it off years later” mean? That after he leaves you will pay him for his share in your house?

Isn’t that a pokemon?

Free cat-sitting?

Not really. All political factions try to sound like they are about principles when in reality they are about tribes.

Could still be worse. They can still mandate that you post it on a paid service. That they own.

The ability to bullshit on demand is an invaluable skill in the corporate world.

If he thinks something doesn’t matter just because the people involved are dead, maybe history is not the right academic field for him.

Polyculture farming is good for the land and good for yields, but monoculture is easier for the government to rule over.

https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/16/book-review-seeing-like-a-state/
https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/10/14/book-review-against-the-grain/

The DNR doesn’t mean a damn thing until it is literally in your hands.

How does the DNR get into the first responder’s hand in practice? Do you get an emergency call and drive there as fast as you can through red lights with your siren on only to be greeted by a relative that made the call handing you the DNR document?

But if the DNR turns out not to be real/legitimate

Are you responsible for validating its legitimacy while in the field, when every second counts?

Yup that’s what I mean.

Seems like a reasonable limitation then (not that the entire business model of scientific journals is reasonable in the 21st century is reasonable - just this specific limitation). The journal’s theme is proprietary, but the paper’s authors still have the LaTeX source so they can just slap a free preamble on it and publish it with that.

Poor “volunteers” will do the backbreaking manual labor. Rich volunteers will drive the heavy machinery in air conditioned cabins.

So basically the article you are allowed to release can have its typesetting - it just can’t have the journal’s preamble/theme?

or even sometimes the peer-reviewed, but NOT typeset article

What does that mean? The LaTeX source?

My name is Josh

Unless you happen to be Josh Vinson Jr. from Omaha, Nebraska - no, it isn’t. Not anymore.