Most cultures frown uppn it but cousin marriage is very common is some parts of the world. There is a great wikipedia article on Incest.
But I was really talking about the former. The likelihood that not a single crossing has happened since the beginning of like is very small.
I’m pretty sure all bloodlines have circles.
Ohhhh I thought it was a baby bird (little wings sticking out) with one weird eye and one winking eye.
Sex is very normal though. Just to make an argument here: what if sex had been banned altogether in the media when you were an impressionable child. How would that have worked out for you?
My guess is not better.
Not if you ask them but taking the time to design a system that isn’t reliant on a strong client (and then open sourcing it) would probably be more secure, and obviously more inclusive.
For instance, I’m very eager to switch to a lknux phone but having blockers like this is forcing me to stay on Android, even though I am sick and tired or the enshittification.
Or even run the app as is on a “non-compliant” os - like a rooted android.
What I meant was that the phone operating system has SDKs (e.g. google services on android) which the app uses to make sure it hasn’t been tampered with, which makes it even harder to make an open source client.
It’s the opposite of supplying an SDK for third party developers.
They are using the phone SDKs to verify that BankID was correctly installed, much like any other client side DRM.
I think you mean cue, not queue.
I once dropped all of my chocolate on the floor. That was a waste of Daim.
My kids started playing now so I “have to” “teach” them how to play.
Sound like exactly like what this person is doing, whoever they are.
I say Pyramids ⊂ Cones. You say Cones ⊂ Pyramids. Therefore Cones = Pyramids.
No, a cone can have any flat shape as its base, wherefor a pyramid - which only has four sides - is also a cone.
A pyramid is just a cone with a square base.
So that you can become an enthusiast again right? Right?
Oh I didn’t realize it was from the article because there is no source!
And if they use the dark pattern of a fake in-app review, so that they can redirect only the good ratings to the app store while opening a “feedback form” for bad ratings - I will actually go out of my way and open the app store and give them a one-star anyway.
This graph is useless without a source. We don’t know how the data was collected or how many data points are included (or discarded). This is probably just lying with statistics 101.
They should pay you monthly for your costs. (: