I’m somewhat new here but I don’t believe there has ever been a defederated that went contested where the admins didn’t share more insights. I do like the transparency but recognize that it comes with extra work. I believe I read somewhere thedude saying that they would only defederate for spam or bot attack reasons. Making it a rule to require a post to be made only of its defederating with one of the top 25 or top 50 or top 100 instances would be a more reasonable ask?
Would it make sense to a preselected list of general instances in each region and simply have a sort of round robin approach to those instances that are within the users geolocation. This will align with legal laws of that user while removing the complexity and offering some sort of balancing of new signups? I know the idea with the fediverse is to be decentralized which it could still be for the users that care but i feel the most majority of people coming from Reddit probably won’t care (at least not at first)
This is great but i feel like we still need some speciality communities that will drive people here. This is an amazing start though
I don’t understand how the American people are just letting this happen in plain sight.
Yes actually! tesseract does allow for you to change the default lemmy front end to it.
From their github readme
Running Tesseract In Place Of Lemmy-UI If you want to run Tesseract in place of Lemmy-UI, just replace the proxy pass that goes to your current Lemmy-UI with the IP/port >of Tesseract. Be sure to keep the conditionals that separate the ActivityPub ld+json out to the API’s container.
I think this should be implemented on a community level and not on an instance level. As much as I don’t like twitter/x myself, it doesn’t mean we should be censoring everyone else.
Is this expected to be released on ollama?