Nah. Non-white people in the crowd are glad they’re one of the good ones 🙏🙏 (they don’t know Trump doesn’t care).
Australian Cyber Security professional
Nah. Non-white people in the crowd are glad they’re one of the good ones 🙏🙏 (they don’t know Trump doesn’t care).
Gun control doesn’t have to be perfect to prevent shootings. Even a small reduction in guns will save lives.
Come on man, you know they didn’t mean it literally 💀
Not Australia 😁😁😁 we use preferential voting and we still fucking suck on environmental issues 😁😁😁
there he is. Vinny.
Apologies, I misread your comment as saying you had to use the terminal to use Linux (I was drunk ngl). I still believe Linux is easier to use than Windows with the caveat that the easiest system to use will always be the one you have the most experience with. I switched from MacOS/Windows to Fedora on my personal machine a few months ago and it’s been smooth sailing for me, though I have always used Linux at least somewhat (I work in cyber security), so that has probably helped.
Dismissing Linux as a tool for a different job (ie not personal/business computing) is an odd position to take for someone with your experience.
lol tell me you’ve never used linux without telling me you’ve never used linux
I don’t think they would do that unless Lemmy continues to grow to a point where it challenges Reddit. Then it becomes a technical issue. I don’t think they can do that. It was one thing for threads to do it, being designed with that in mind from day 1, but it’s completely different for Reddit to do it. There are so many features that just wouldn’t make the jump, and so much content that would need to be reworked.
If they were going to do it, it would most likely be a clean break where you just can’t access old Reddit content on Lemmy, but all their new stuff would be accessible.
I also just don’t see them giving away their content like that after cracking down on the API how they did.
I feel like the amount of training data required for these AIs serves as a pretty compelling argument as to why AI is clearly nowhere near human intelligence. It shouldn’t take thousands of human lifetimes of data to train an AI if it’s truly near human-level intelligence. In fact, I think it’s an argument for them not being intelligent whatsoever. With that much training data, everything that could be asked of them should be in the training data. And yet they still fail at any task not in their data.
Put simply; a human needs less than 1 lifetime of training data to be more intelligent than AI. If it hasn’t already solved it, I don’t think throwing more training data/compute at the problem will solve this.
I assume they’re talking about tear gas used by police (Trump’s thugs) in protests.