Joe Biden presented the deal in May 2024 and Netanyahu quickly rejected it. It’s only when Steve Witkoff, Trump’s envoy, forced Netanyahu to meet during Shabbat and pressured him to take the deal that it the ceasefire actually happened, shortly before Trump’s inauguration.

If your bridge is as useless as your comment, probably not.

A couple months ago when his envoy, Steve Witkoff, made Netanyahu meet him during Shabbat despite Netanyahu’s objections, and pressured him to accept the ceasefire deal.

Ukraine can’t win against Russia. It can try to limit the damages now and keep existing as a country or continue the war and risk being entirely invaded. That’s a risky proposition.

Unfortunately it is becoming evident that European countries will not join the war and therefore Ukraine is on its own.

No, I didn’t say any of this. Why are you putting words in my mouth?

Well, I guess the future will let us know soon enough if you’re right.

Nope, the survey is about the help given so far, not about the future. 30% think too much help has been given.

That’s not destruction of Ukraine.

Destruction of Ukraine is what might happen if there’s no ceasefire.

The majority of Americans do not want to provide more money and arms to Ukraine. Only a fraction of the population want to provide more arms and money to Ukraine.

That’s not total destruction of Ukraine. Words have meaning.

Fighting until all Ukrainians are dead or have fled or surrendered is not really a great option, is it?

The article you shared does not substantiate your claim that “the money she had access to when she became the nominee was already spent”

Besides, she raised plenty of money on her own https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2024/07/kamala-harris-drives-record-fundraising-after-biden-exit/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-campaign-fundraising-1-billion/

How do you “evaporate” money that is already under Harris’ control?

After dropping from the race Biden no longer had control over the campaign funds.

Besides, even if we were to imagine that Biden could still hypothetically somehow take away the campaign funds, Harris still chose to play ball.

After dropping from the race Biden no longer had control over the campaign funds.

Besides, even if we were to imagine that Biden could still hypothetically somehow take away the campaign funds, Harris still chose to play ball.

Both Trump and Biden/Harris are terrible choices for Palestine. Having said that, count the number of Palestinian casualties under Biden and the number of Palestinian casualties under Trump. I’ll wait.

Also count the number of weeks of ceasefire brokered by Trump vs Biden.

She had control over the money. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/can-kamala-harris-access-biden-campaign-funds/

Of course she had a choice.

She had access to the campaign funds. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/can-kamala-harris-access-biden-campaign-funds/

Is this a joke? Are you pretending Harris did not make a choice here?

No, she didn’t have to stick with Biden. She chose to. Again, what would have happened had she taken her distances from Biden after having secured the nomination?

Norway is a beautiful country I’ve had the chance to visit some fjords.

As for the actual conversation, it started with the EU moral compass, not individual people. European leaders can’t keep pretending to have the moral high ground and then just be an accomplice of genocide or remain silent about it. That’s called hypocrisy and the world is noticing.

Of course, people of those countries are entitled to their own opinions and to take moral and ethical standpoints; but before lecturing other countries they may want to take a look at their own country.

Have a good day.