five consecutive posts in a single community is a bit much for what is essentially the same story. why not put them all in the body of a single post where they could be discussed together?

you made five posts about this just in !usa@lemmy.ml

When Miamoto died,

Myamoto isn’t dead

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shigeru_Miyamoto 🤦

the leap from “lower factual error rates than an equally-prompted baseline without retrieval (as judged by an external LLM)” to “enables trustworthy, cross-domain scientific synthesis at scale and establishes the foundation for an ever-expanding encyclopedia”

in 2019 when they locked everybody in Southern California using a certain major service out of making edits

I assume that block is not still in effect?

I was trying to edit an article on carbon because they had an isotope incorrectly labeled

Out of curiosity, was this error eventually corrected, or is it still wrong today?

Encyclopedia Britannica still rules and is worth the money

I just looked for the first time in years and it appears you can read it for free… What do you get by paying for it besides disabling the ads (which my ad blocker already does)?

I see they have a list of changes to articles now, but they don’t show the old versions or diffs between them.

Also I see there are “Quick summary” and “Ask the chatbot a question” buttons on every page 🤡

Or, you know, just block domains that use Microsoft email

I’m guessing you probably don’t realize how many organizations host their email with Microsoft.

Democrats like yourself insisted that this wasn’t a big deal

lol! you obviously have me confused with someone else

Maybe,

why maybe and not obviously yes?

but Democrats are running an 80 year-old conservative

they’re also running a 41 year old murder enthusiast who is larping as a progressive, and they’re bolstering his credibility by pretending to fear his policies. it’s called hedging.

His problem is he never expected to run for office and therefore didn’t delete his socials.

You think the problem is that he didn’t delete is socials? (He actually did delete them and hoped to get away with it, it’s just that reddit archives exist and someone leaked his username to CNN.)

I think the problem is actually that (in his own words) he “wanted to have an adventure and kill some people. Joined up in ‘04, did Fallujah and Ramadi, and managed both.”

The primary is still seven months away.

Platner says some good things, but given his absurd lies about his lack of knowledge about his nazi tattoo, and his vague downplaying of these murder-loving reddit comments as being “a long time ago” (without even actually disavowing anything specific) despite them reaching all the way up to 2021, it’s difficult to believe anything he says.

Since Maine voters do seem to have an appetite for the actually-progressive policy positions he’s endorsed, shouldn’t someone more credibly holding those positions run?

No, what’s Trumpian is literally aligning with Trump to defeat progressive candidates.

i agree reactions can be useful, but adding them to email the way Microsoft has is obnoxious for recipients using any client other than theirs. and, i think this is probably their intention: receiving an email reaction in a client that doesn’t render it as a reaction feels wrong and MS probably hopes this will encourage some people to switch to using Outlook.

the right way to add reactions to email would be to make it opt-in (and also not a vendor-specific header but instead something which aims to become a standard): clients should only allow reactions to messages which contain a header signaling that the sender supports receiving them.