Of course. But their target audience will not consider that for a moment.
Of course. But their target audience will not consider that for a moment.
I know it’s hard but you have to stick to the facts. Don’t let russian propagandists in beanies tell you otherwise.
You’ve introduced a lot of noise around the simple fact that only one candidate is unwilling to accept the results of the election. It’s scary that you can convince yourself otherwise with enough distraction.
In the same speech in Wisconsin, Standifer described the strategy to train Christians as election workers as “a Trojan horse.”
What are you disputing? You can dispute inaccurate or fraudulent marks on your credit.
That’s awesome! Just wanted to get you to take a second look in case you were as diligent as my friend but it sounds like you’re right, then!
You sure about that? I have a friend who thought that too but found out 7 years later that only a bankruptcy will disappear after 7 years, not just idle delinquint accounts. He needed to actually file for bankrupcy to make it go away. This was in Usa, NY; maybe it’s different other places.
As a second “data” point: I have some accounts on my credit report that have not been touched in a decade+ yet they are still there (they are not delinquent).
But the transcripts show that the “due to age and confusion” was a mischaracterization by Hur. It’s like when Barr declared the Mueller report exonerated trump.
There are a lot of podcasts that break it down if you’re not interested in looking at the transcripts yourself.
Huntsville imported 1000+ Nazi scientists to work on rockets in the 50’s. That may explain the outlier.