Lmao

And your strategy of voting for them no matter what their policy is works very well, I suppose?

We’ve been trying that for decades, buddy. Dissatisfaction with the dems is not “seeking perfection”, “nagging”, or any other patronizing mischaracterization you wish to paint it as.

“Don’t bother asking for better policies!” is a great slogan for the party lol.

You seem to be saying that the voters are irrational. That may or not be the case, but it’s largely irrelevant to converting them.

Absolutely nobody considering a vote for Jill Stein thinks she is going to win. This is a slice of the electorate that the dems haven’t won over yet, but could.

Ombi, yo.

Jill Stein is there so that people who want to vote, but are mad as fuck at the dems, have someone to vote for. Basically, she’s there to scare the dems (working, obviously). Will they be scared enough to adopt some better policies, and get those votes?

But you’d have to bribe a lot more to sway legislation, and nobody serves more than like a year or two so you can’t “buy for life”. Also, congress people are already shockingly cheap.

Greatly expand congress (like at least 10x), and have it work like jury duty.

I have never heard of dogs being used to mass inspect USPS packages. I’m unsure if that would qualify as a reason for opening USPS packages. I can tell you as someone who lives in a community infamous as the source of many illicit packages (and the destination of the subsequent illicit payments), common knowledge here is to use USPS.

Pack your shit up tight, and send it with USPS. They need a reason (real suspicion) to open your package, so don’t give them any.

First was Lupaslipaphobia?

Ahhh, blue maga. Carry on.

Same cartoon except it’s a Harris hat, and instead of racists, it’s genocidaires.

Don’t Stop Believing in My Ass

🙄

How many times can I tell you that you’re missing the point. None of what you said matters! When Biden or Harris can barely even pretend to be against genocide, and continue to be responsible (via their current positions of power) for arming the Israelis, that is an acute emergency. The only reason that a potential dem voter is considering voting for Stein instead, is that, #1: she’s on the ballot, and #2: she’s against the genocide.

Any of your attacks or criticisms of her are irrelevant as long as those two things are true, or until Harris makes a drastic change to her policy.

You’re missing the point. Nobody has to trust her word. She doesn’t have to be right about everything, she just has to be correct on this particularly important issue. Nobody thinks Jill Stein is going to win. Nobody. So they don’t have to imagine how she would implement her platform. It is irrelevant.

The problem for the democrats is that they are so WRONG on this one thing (genocide), that a certain subset of their potential voters can’t bring themselves to vote dem. Some of those voters may be bluffing and some may not be. Dems will roll the dice and hope for the best, rather than come out against genocide (my prediction).

I’m not talking about “Liberalism”, I’m talking about “liberals”. They aren’t driving me crazy because of some obscure philosophical tenets, though “scarcity harm reduction” might do it.