I had a female boss.
Adjective is fine, using it as noun is icky
I had a female boss.
Adjective is fine, using it as noun is icky
Hey, I’m sorry I didn’t get a PhD in “Lemmy instance vibe checking” before I chose to go for the devs’ instance.
Fuck Trump, and fuck generalizing tribalism.
Whoever dies first loses.
Weird how he’s helping the far right in both cases.
Did you get lost?
Originally „der Brandner Kaspar“ from 1871
Big difference between the pro and consumer versions though. Which ones are you referring to?
Very true. I doubt the researcher in question would object to use a virus scanner like you described.
Every consumer antivirus software works like the black box rootkit you described, AFAIK.
Totally reasonable to not do a dumb thing if you have no contractual obligation to do the dumb thing.
Sadly they had that obligation, so they have to weigh the cost of doing the dumb thing with the cost of breaching contract.
No, that’s not the take-away.
Going without AV as a computer-savvy person is perfectly reasonable, as AV companies can’t be trusted, and AVs are notorious for having deep seated privileges and bad security themselves – therefore increasing your attack surface.
The take-away is that if you’re deciding for an institution that’s contractually obligated to do a thing, you should do it.
Again: not what the person said. They said that if someone proves that you host CSAM, you should take it down.
If you had read the article, you’d know!
No, that’s not what the person is saying in the slightest. Just read their comment again, it’s actually very clear.
No. You can say that about so many laws being made, but telegram simply hosts the most vile shit.
It’s not perfect, but it’s good introductory material for people who fell for the right-wing propaganda of “everybody’s called a fascist now, there isn’t even a definition”.
Yes, suckers, there are people with an understanding of what fascism is, and they agree for a reason about the dangers of things like calling people vermin, casting doubt on election integrity, and strong man rhetoric.
Almost as if he is one and the definitions agree for a reason.
You’re talking as if there weren’t pedagogic professionals who have solved this problem. If a child is that unwilling to conform even slightly, the child either has special needs and doesn’t belong there, or, more likely, there’s shit going down at the child’s home and CPS need to get involved.
I’m thoroughly baffled that you think there’s any kind of argument to be made for corporeal punishment. The scientific world has solved and moved on a century ago. The backwater sticklers who still don’t get it are harmful Luddites, not people with opinions to take seriously.
Yeah, the Nazis weren’t really subtle. If you instead maintain a civil front inward for public support, you can wreak havoc more effectively.
That’s why fascism is a different kind of danger. It wouldn’t leech off of other places for centuries, it would explosively and directly attack internal and external enemies.
Neither of these things can be risked.
And proceeds to not pretend that he does.
That’s at least four levels of credibility more than I expected.