https://archive.is/20251128165118/https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2025/11/28/rare-red-cockaded-woodpecker-tennessee-plan/

https://archive.is/20250831142954/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/31/age-verification-uk-porn-sites/

First comment on the post:

James Kettle: Hi, I’m the author of this research. It’s great to see interest and I can promise some quality research and a strong argument to kill HTTP/1.1 but the headline of this article goes a bit too far. The specific CDN vulnerabilities have been disclosed to the vendors and patched (hence the past tense in the abstract) – I wouldn’t drop zero day on a CDN! That said I do expect to see fresh critical CDN vulnerabilities in future – hopefully found by a white hat!

4chan comes to mind. /fit/ would probably have a bunch of BS for you to trawl, /ck/ will probably have dietary misinfo, maybe /sci/ as well.

https://archive.is/20250216043655/https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/02/15/denali-mount-mckinley-trump-alaska-renaming/

https://archive.is/20241126194720/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/26/science/wolves-flowers-nectar-pollinate.html