It’s a case against the government. If it hurts the Dems, the SC might be more interested in it. In all likelihood, they would be looking ahead to cases where they wouldn’t want to give precedent to climate protections but just a flippant remark highlighting the corruption of the SC.
Now:
Uh what??
Sounds like they made up their mind at the RNC when Teamsters President Sean O’Brien gave his address. Hmm…
Edit for clarity in the quote