Because they did it on every other item they sell with a screen and internet connection.

It’s nitnjustbthatbthey show ads, it’s that they track you and show you ads based on that data.

This is documented in the manual. Here is the solution. Can you please write a clearer entry, so the next person understands better, as you did not understand how I wrote it.

People are lazy. Make them do the work by asking and they will learn to do less work by checking the manual and not asking you.

Maxine oeake is always great but almost everyone in this series is good. Well worth a look.

That was my first thought, but hearing her statements, I think she’s out. If she was pivoting to something else, I think she would have announced that instead.

They won’t find someone so earnest. So, they might have less success. The sycophant won’t be as high profile and therefornpesa powerful.

There is a third option. Trump is a fool with a brain of mush and Mamdani was just personable and vaguely flattering while sticking to his agenda. Trump believes whomever speaks to him.

Yes, but if you like it and are advancing, then you could stay. If the next boss is same or worse, the option to leave is still there, but the jobs market may be better by then.

Geographical location isn’t the issue. Nobody wants to kick Australia out.

They work in Japan.

Yes, but rather than self praise, it seems to me like it’s being effusive and polite. As in, I’m not trying to be disruptive, please accept this kind gesture.

Or the Chinese.

However, the point is that if they go bust, the technology is not lost. Someone will buy it and will seek to profit from it in the same way that NVIDIA currently does, by selling buck loads and pushing forward with development.

Why does anyone need NVIDIA? If they go busy, they sell their assets to pay their debts. Including IP.

I don’t think NVIDIA will go bust. They have a product people want even without ai and have been profitable for years.

However, they will have a giant correction.

Vegemite, so good, it’s even wanted by the bad.

I think Nike hot a boost in sales when people found out in the 80s it was a brand favoured by burglars. So it must be soft and fast.

Or its malicious compliance.

If this doesn’t get released, it becomes a bigger deal. Trying to pocket veto this would backfire.

I don’t think it’s the fact that she stuck by Bill. I think it’s the way she did it. She stuck by him and pretended that the women who had previously accused him we’re non existent and it was all Lewinskys fault. I think there was something about her not being Tammy Lynnette just standing by here man, but they were a team. However they were never together and all reports were that she despised him behind the scenes. It was seen as trying to pretend to be someone she is not, purely for power.

Yes, which is what that poster is saying.

AI technology is not a bubble. Investment in AI technology is a bubble.

You could even argue that it ruined Hilary Clinton’s presidency before it even started. Many turned against her when she decided to stick by Bill, in what was seen as a political act of convenience, that she tried to frame as duty and forgiveness.

The money around AI is a bubble. AI will stay, but not in the same format. That’s why the poster above said “AI itself”, to differentiate between the technology and the financials of the technology.

Od say it’s more that he doesn’t want to be left holding the bag. Dump now and you sell near the top of the market.