Let me share with you a talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fZTOjd_bOQ

Them.

The taskbar is an outdated (30 years old) concept that should be extinct.

It was created to always allow the user to launch or resume their programs, even when they launch a fullscreen program.

I think it’s time to improve workflows. I don’t expect Microsoft leads the (proper) way. They are too busy including ads into the taskbar.

EDIT: Let me share with you a talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fZTOjd_bOQ

A question for the lemmy community: Why the negative votes? It is because the link is considered SPAM? It is because the TLDR of the post?

I always though that the votes is for the publication, not the referred content.

On the other hand:

• Loop-device exhaustion (slow, though Ubuntu has increased the limit via a patch).
• A single point of failure due to Canonical’s repository imposition (a closed garden).
• Unmaintained branches and snapped apps.
• Implicit installation of snapped apps through the apt CLI instead of the originally supported packages 🤬 (what the hell, Canonical!? Are you doing the same crap as Microsoft?).

The server-side closed garden is the opposite of an open ecosystem and the open-source community. You can add custom repositories to APT or Flatpak. Every new snap interaction feels like another step toward forcing the user to use it, instead of offering cool features that convince users on their own merits.

The last change (installing snapped apps when you run apt install) was horrendous. What’s next? Installing snapped apps when the user runs flatpak install?

You could try mine, SimpleK8s (kubeadm, containerd, systemd, buildroot), ~50Mb single file (kernel+initramfs). https://simplek8s.org/

The current footprint is lower than every alternatives commented on this article.

You are giving access to the docker socket (/var/run/docker.sock), so this container can create/edit/remove any container from your system, even add,edit, remove volumes or host path.

I have no idea if you can send modification API commands to a ReadOnly socket. I think you could, in the same way that you can do something with just HTTP-GET. Example: curl --unix-socket /var/run/docker.sock http:/images/json

Doc: https://docs.docker.com/reference/api/engine/version/v1.41/#tag/Container/operation/ContainerInspect

The node memory is not the same as the pod memory limits. Do you checkout your pods limits? kubectl describe pod blahblahblah

Doc: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/manage-resources-containers/

The article doesn’t comment the velocity: 16 T/s 🤷 You can see it in one of the article graph.

https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

It takes a time to compile the whole project, but a way less than Firefox and Chrome. There is an AUR package for ArchLinux.

IMHO, it is not yet daily-drive usable. Really slow for JS. The window manager is extreme limited (I can not drag tabs outside the window). It can not render steampowered neither youtube (I didn’t test any more websites, just these two). The current setting page is just a window popup with a checkbox for one option. But competition is always good for the users. A web browser is a big project for today standards. Good luck to these developers 💪👍

I tested it the last week from the main git branch, it doesn’t open YouTube homepage, yet.