• 17 Posts
  • 131 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2025

help-circle

  • …well this conference has been the final nail in the coffin for me

    Wasn’t going to vote for them anyway but I hoped they would get their shit together enough to be part of a left wing coalition. There’s been multiple indicators from the conference and the results of it that it’s just going to continue to go further into chaos and fail to attract people to it

    The name choice is at least something I can laugh a bit about though. Don’t understand why “Your Party” was even an option. It would obviously be widely ridiculed if it was chosen. The other choices were so bad too though. Don’t understand how they couldn’t think of any better options than “Our Party”, “For The Many” and “Popular Alliance”




  • I see your point with this and I agree that something that’s happening in your own country would hit you harder than an equal situation in another. I’m more pointing out the sheer disparity between the two that is the case the vast majority of the time and the reactions around that. Even if atrocities are more common in certain other countries, treating it with basically next to no empathy (or sometimes even thinking it’s right that it’s happening or just a natural thing) and then something very small in comparison happening here is given vast amounts more attention and empathy isn’t something I can see as excusable. Especially given how often European countries have a hand in those atrocities happening. If it’s a case of not understanding the context then again I don’t think the default should then just be to not care about innocents dying. I’m not expecting people to go out and try and stop it or whatever but to do more at least than just shrug it off. Just because it’s the norm to have this attitude doesn’t make it right






  • I agree with everything you say here. I’m well aware it’s long been a thing to scapegoat minorities of course, for centuries and centuries. The media isn’t the primary cause, but it’s the main thing that is driving us towards fascist ideas being legitimised, as I see it. Without them doing that we wouldn’t be in nearly as bad a situation as we are today. We can’t get to sorting out the ills as anyone who genuinely wants to is demonised and delegitimised


  • I can’t remember exactly where I saw it and when but I remember in the last couple months seeing a poll where how important different issues and topics were to voters from each party were shown. Reform voters were very high on things like healthcare, affordability, nationalisation of industries and so on. Even more so than any other party besides the Greens, I think

    Obviously immigration came out top for the Reform voters, but the poll as a whole says what leftists have been saying for so long now. Some will be voting for Reform from just a racist perspective, of course, but most will be doing it because they’ve been tricked into thinking that the reason they can’t have those things that they really want is because of immigration. Especially in all the many poor, struggling areas Reform are doing best in

    Our media has cooked so many people’s thinking. And our electoral system is going to force us to have a strong chance of a fascist government when the majority don’t want it


  • I don’t see this as upholding free speech. It’s being painted in the media so far that this is simply about single sex toilets and “making women feel safe”. Notice how they never say “cis women”. Their choice of words speaks for itself. Should councillors have to listen to overt fascists give their views too? Seeing as they don’t “feel safe” around non white people? We know full well these people wouldn’t stop at single sex toilets, they just go on about that more than anything cos it’s the only thing they can twist into making themselves seem the victim. They’d happily take free speech away from trans people. Underneath, most of them are similar to Graham Linehan



  • They wouldn’t do this when the better option for them is to make Mamdani’s ambitions for New York as hard as possible to bring to fruition. Even if they only hinder him a bit, any inability at all from Mamdani to do every single thing he wants to do (and things they claim he wants to do) will see relentless coverage in the right wing media (and likely also some from liberal media) in order to paint it as a “failed project” and how “unrealistic socialism is.” That serves them far better than just disappearing the guy

    I see your point about how they will try and make Mamdani look as bad as possible in the meeting but he could withstand it far better than Zelenskyy, I reckon. Nothing wrong with Zelenskyy on that front, just it’s obvious Mamdani would do better





  • Why do some people keep repeating the thing about the name and acting like they can’t decide? I also think it’s been going very badly and there’s so much to criticise. But they made it clear from the very beginning that they’d allow the members to vote on the name at their first conference, which is happening this month








  • Thank you for linking this. I’ve looked at every instance of “transport” in the document and it’s almost all about maintaining and renewing current infrastructure. Which is good, of course, but nowhere does it seem to talk about affordability. In the part where it talks about how they’re going to decarbonise the UK in regards to transport, again it just seems to talk about pushing for electric cars.

    Correct me if I’m wrong and have missed things though. I’d be pleased to see that they’re actually going to make public transport affordable. It’s good to make what’s there better and expand it. But if most people still aren’t able to use it and having a car is cheaper, it’s not going to have nearly the outcome it should