Why would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you?
Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao.
If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.
According to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev….
You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable.
Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.
Yes. They had to clarify that every character is “obviously” over the age of 20.
That’s not a claim that gets made if there was no way to make the mistake.
Are you just willingly ignoring all the facts and details right in front of you to spin this fantasy of yours?
And you are only using the current build, your information isn’t even applicable to the topic.
My copy doesn’t have naked kids, so it never did.
That’s your defense, when the game was stated to have been banned for… you guessed it! But are going to ignore it.
Do you just lack basic reading comprehension skills? Or do you not know how to critically think for yourself?
Just because a dentist in America or Europe charge $5000 vs $500 in other countries doesn’t mean they are a better dentist lol. There’s just different ways of doing things, and of course your local denstist is going to assume their way is the best, or why else would we do it that way?
If anything, they are the regular price and yours are inflated, always other perspectives.
No, but it’s Puritan to take something that isn’t and assert that it is.
You’ve supplied no “truth” or “evidence” to the contrary, so the only defence you’re saying is, “naked kids are okay”. Which it isn’t. That’s the issue being addressed.
And like every other puritan you accuse and insult reasonable people who don’t want Puritans to misrepresent media and decide what everyone else gets to consume.
Says the one rolling their eyes at someone trying to point out your incorrect assumptions, information and views?
It’s not black and white, just because someone doesn’t accept child sexualism or nudity in media, doesn’t make them a puritan.
In case it hasn’t been made obvious yet, you are not the reasonable person here, a reasonable person doesn’t want naked kiddos in the media lmfao. That’s the nail right there. You started with the insults, so don’t play the high ground. You’re just a horrible person.
Keep defending wanting naked kiddos in media! You keep trying to focus on the term sexual, that’s not the only concern being addressed with.
I’m not defending child sexual material. I’m saying that what was described was not child sexual material. It obviously isn’t unless you’re some weirdo Puritan on a crusade.
But it is. It’s not puritan to not want children in a sexualized or naked setting. The horror or creep aspect doesn’t matter. It’s just not an acceptable narrative. And it’s fucking creepy as shit seeing you defend it so vehemently.
obviously more interested in a witch hunt than the truth anyway.
Says the one ignoring facts and saying “we don’t know” and claiming that’s the truth? What truth is “we don’t know”? Fallacies to hide behind, there’s no truth in not knowing. The facts are, they changed their game, which made it acceptable AFTER. So it had to have been offending before. And that was all storefronts, not just valve. So that argument you’re using doesn’t even work.
Average response from entering a line and starting the next. There’s a delay while the information is sent, and before they start typing the next line.
What?
The figures have been compiled by the Dutch academic
Where does Americans come into this other than being referenced by another country?
Tokyo has more population in a smaller footprint. What’s your point? Is Tokyo above or below New York? Makes an important reference point.
I mean this just makes it sound like New York City needs to lower their emissions.
All the AI is as bad as ONE city, that really doesn’t sound that bad in that case, but when you start realizing, coal country, reliant on cars. Where does New York fit in? Middle? Top of the list of most pollutant cities?
Without context it doesn’t mean much. If it’s the lowest emitting city, well then This is good isn’t it?
Sorry for trying to have a discussion about why the meme falls apart. If you think I’m attacking the meme content, that says all I need about you, like the other user.
And? It’s called consistency in narrative.
If you can’t even make sure you’re consistent from one frame to next, why is anything else you’re going to be said taken as seriously? When you can’t even spend 2 seconds to make sure you haven’t fucked something up.
Removed by mod
Do you need the term consistency in narrative explained to you?
Removed by mod
Or someone does make a legit critique and you just go off the wall assuming they are cowards and are making a direct insult to you.
Maybe if you take everything as an insult when it’s not, you’re creating issues. It’s hard to engage and have a discussion when people like you exist and derail stuff because you think they’re insulting you, when they aren’t.
Look at the jerseys, not the same dude.
What? Cant criticize a shittely made meme? I wasn’t even talking about the content lol and you go and assume THAT? You’re the problem dude.
Boo. It’s not even the same person top and bottoms frames.
You won’t be able to order the next batch unless you charge the increase in the first as you won’t have the funds.
Just because a journalist says something doesn’t mean it’s even remotely true.
Basic economics.