I’m sorry but thats not “we believe our clients innocence”. That is a statement of almost certain inaccuracy from their knowledge and a pretty huge sign of their lack of values. Neither needs to fold into being a good lawyer and defending your client.
But yeah, sure, I gave up earning money by quitting my job on values. That doesn’t mean they need to, it just means they chose money over being decent humans
Fuck them
Yes and no
“Low priority” and “first” are actually pretty different statements. “First” requires pretty authoritarian control over how people spend their time. But the statements are thrown together pretty often and people intuitively accept them. Realistically the world is a bunch of people doing their own thing, and in that world a small fraction of time and resources is spent on space. Some of this ends up being useful technology is developed for the rest of the world too. Personally I’m hopeful for stations and bases doing some of the expensive research for closed loop products and recycling but that’s still a hope and far from a certainty
It was Epic Furry one of their press releases for a few hours
Dictators can affect funding and deals pretty well, they have a lot less influence on the products. From what I’ve seen most “tech” topics are mostly shiny new products and the periphery to that
I wasn’t replying to a comment about if this is solved or not, or the complexities of getting an outcome that most people are happy with. I replied to a comment that simplified the issue all the way to “it’s the parent’s choice”.
Your comment is opening up new issues, that I agree make enforcement while respecting privacy more difficult (but that I personally don’t think are insurmountable)
Yes… liquor, guns, driving, and physical punishment should solely be parents choice. Wait… those caused issues and the government decided to mitigate some of the negative consequences?
Was this written with genAI? Even the TLDR is padded fluff of common talking points
TLDR: They don’t know
They also touch on possible reasons for a pretty small percentage of the article
A more accurate title would have been: Punch was cute, learn more about macaques
The administration refers to it as a war now, or at least they did, they just won’t officially label it a war
Kind of, but there are plenty of paper and wood decomposers and we still use plenty of those. It will have consequences but you already have to service vehicles and you already need to sanitise hospital equipment
I’m curious what you mean by “succeed” here. I’m assuming not “Trump holds a press conference says he’s done and sells some questionable statements as why”. I’m assuming you have something more concrete but I’m not sure what it is. Levelling the place like what happened in Palestine? Sending in the army to help with a regime change like they did in Iraq? Waking up tomorrow and there is a pro-US christian government in place that’s sycophantic to Trump?
By “free pass” do you mean “only point out issues with Bibi”? I personally wouldn’t call that a free pass but if that is what you mean, I get your comment, if it isn’t then I probably need it explained to me
They clearly mean the USA and if you read slightly further they also cover at least one reason the US losing bases is bad for people besides the US:
Because Bibi wants to wipe them all out, and he can’t do that why they host US bases
I’m not trying to say the US should have bases by the way, your comment just seems to be shooting from the hip and filled with emotion enough that you’re not reading
Why is the distinction important in this case?
Is it reasonable to wonder if the official that isn’t speaking in their first language chose a slightly incorrect word?
It’s this guy:
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mg6vitp4rc2v
RAJU: You’ll concede this is war?
MARKWAYNE MULLIN: We haven’t declared war. They declared war on us
RAJU: The president called it war and Secretary Hegseth called it war
REPORTER: When you walked up just now, you called it war
MULLIN: Okay. That was a misspoke.
The study has each country listed out. It’s just the press releases that don’t. The study didn’t break out each age cohort for each country. That can be inferred but there are likely a few surprises, and the bias you mention from cultural groups with a larger population
Here’s the comment with the study link:
https://mander.xyz/comment/25666102
Here’s an example:
You appear to be linking to my own (later) comment
I separated them because to me they are different (related) points and I don’t particularly enjoy seeing people make multiple points when I only agree with one of them. I was also curious how many people agreed we shouldn’t be linking journalism that doesn’t link to the original study
This seems to be the press release from one of the groups that did the study:
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/almost-third-gen-z-men-globally-agree-wife-should-obey-her-husband
At the bottom is a download button with extra data analysis and their methodology but here is a direct link:
FFS don’t share journalism that summarises a study without linking to it
TLDR: Water melt accumulates at the equator so there is more mass further away from the centre of rotation