• 8 Posts
  • 624 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2024

help-circle

  • “Das geht” I’ve used in class as “that works for me”. I’m hoping the question form (“Das geht?”) is usable?

    Almost. It’s a question, so it should be:

    Geht das?

    which is a super common expression.

    All in all:

    Na ja. $500 ist zu teuer! “Wicked” ist nur $150 um 19 Uhr am Sonnetag. Geht das?

    Also:

    DeepL did recommend the verb “kostet” btw. “ist” is how the sentence was formed originally with my own level of German. It does seem to flow better to use the verb kostet.

    Yep, slightly, also see my other comment below. “ist” is fine, especially in spoken language. “kostet” might be a bit nicer, but not technically “more correct”.

    If I’d have said/written the sentence out of my own volition, I’d probably have swapped the word order around a bit:

    Naja. $500 is zu teuer! “Wicked” kostet am Sonntag um 19 Uhr nur $150. Geht das?

    Your sentence is also grammatically correct though.





  • Lmao. Lmfao, even.

    Here, I’m gonna save you some time and summarize the article for you:

    • everyone is talking about how good LLMs are [citation missing], but they’re missing the point!
    • because really, we’re already so much further ahead! There be magic tools out there!
    • wait, you want to know which ones? Uuuuh sorry, the people building then are keeping them a secret…
    • …because they are just THAT FRIGHTENINGLY GOOD! [citation missing]
    • seriously, I used one of them to build a 30k/month product in 2 hours with zero coding!
    • I mean… A subset at least. Oh I also did not do any review, so no idea just how badly fucked it is. Ah, and I guess the price tag comes from the existing reputation and legal guarantees provided by the original tool, which obviously I also couldn’t replicate.
    • but worry not! I’m sure I’d be able to build the full tool in DAYS!
    • I won’t though. Even though it could TOTALLY make me 30k per month per user. Totally.
    • instead, I’ll PROVE to you JUST HOW GOOD these SECRET TOOLS are! Checkout this GitHub repo!
    • …ah, no, sorry, I misspoke. I’ll obviously NOT be using the secret, but TOTALLY REAL [citation missing] tools that this entire article is about. For some reason. They’re totally real though bro. Trust me bro. I’m sure one more data-center will fix it bro. Just need to prompt right bro. Like bro, people don’t realize how gooooooood LLMs are bro. I swear bro. My prompts are so good I need to keep them secret because it’s SCARY bro. Bro.

    Ahem. Maybe I editorialized a tiny bit. Not much though, trust me bro.





  • That’s what I’m not so sure about though. Forgejo/codeberg/… projects are already not hard to find through search engines. Add a federated in-forgejo search and you’d be set there.

    And currently the problem indeed is that a forgejo project is on instance X, and you, as a developer only have accounts on Y and Z. But through federation, that would stop mattering, so I don’t get the “it’s where contributors are”: as long as contributors have a single forgejo account anywhere, we’d be good.




  • Yep yep yep. I have forgejo accounts on so many instances (including on my own, 2-person instance which hosts all my personal shit). I’d love to be able to jump into discussions and open PRs on other people’s forges without needing a new account.

    Forgejo in particular is just a fantastic forge. It’s surprisingly feature-rich, and so, so fast compared to GitHub, even on very lowspecced hardware. I honestly think that if federation is properly implemented, then in the long run, GitHub will become obsolete for FOSS projects.



  • I’d like to add that this doesn’t even necessarily have to be intentional.

    I’m certain the current bubble will pop sooner rather than later, but by that point (and today already as well), all the infrastructure, the data centers etc. will already have been built.

    And they will not just disappear.

    Some might be scavenged for parts to be sold off, but far more likely, I unfortunately think, is that governments will (be lobbied to) step in, and prevent the loss of hardware, of companies, and especially of jobs. They obviously won’t start the money-burning, consumer-facing ChatGPTs & Co again, so what else can we do with all that hardware that’s sitting there, looking for a purpose?

    Exactly the thing the person above me said. Implement the surveillance state at an unprecedented scale and speed, because those GPUs need SOMETHING to do, lest all that capital be wasted.

    There will be a bailout, and we’ll all suffer for it.



  • Sorry, unfortunately can’t help you there. My matrix server is not federated, I remember back then I created an account on matrix.org specifically to read these. But maybe they got deleted in the meantime?

    Anyways, I have been really happy with continuwuity, to the point that up until now, I haven’t even looked at tuwunel again. The maintainers of continuwuity seem really nice and engaged, and both from a usage and stability point of view, as well as for the actually surprisingly fast release cycle, I have no complaints. I found and fixed a bug a couple weeks ago, and the dev process was also very friendly and relaxed.

    In short: while I don’t know how things are on the tuwunel side, I’m very happy to have gone with continuwuity and have high hopes for the future of the project.