What’s not in their jeans is probably in their genes.
What’s not in their jeans is probably in their genes.
Wait what’s the joke
I find I often have to stop for a moment and imagine her life up until the sniper shot. Like, you and I have ONE life, and it’s EVERYTHING, and this girl’s went dark for the remainder of the universe.
Scientists have been edging us with woolly mammoths for decades.
Oh bother I can’t remember who did the study, but Earthling Ed in his book talks about it, whereby participants were either served meat or not during questions regarding diet, and those who were eating meat became almost obtusely against vegan diets. I tried searching for it just now but can’t think of the right keywords to find it.
Unless you’re a male chicken, then your range is whatever the dimensions of the Live Rooster Masher is.
Oh I upvoted it because I’d never seen the bot before, and liked the idea (even though it didn’t work here). I have the mediafactcheck add-on which simply shows a websites bias in my Firefox toolbar, I think it’s a good idea to have media bias constantly in the public eye.
Oh dear I remember playing around with explosives as a kid, chlorine, break fluid, tin foil, that kinda thing. Then we started playing around with acetone and peroxide, trying to make a touch explosive. I count my blessings that we didn’t do it correctly, as I absolutely would have lost a hand. I don’t know how you can explain to some people the risks associated with this kinda stuff, the book we were using called the touch explosive “Mother of Satan”. If that didn’t dissuade us…
You could probably say that to the majority of social media comments, right?
The best review of chess is right here IMO
The issue with finding homosexual behaviour in animals is that it’s never exclusive. Homosexual animals tend to be bisexual at best, and can often be chalked up to erroneous mating.
A lot of these studies are used to validate human homosexuality and harm the “it’s unnatural!” argument touted by conservatives. However using a Call to Nature is fallacious, and could be used to validate all number of animal behaviour.
Man I hate “bad take roleplay” comments.
“How dare you [insert opposing reasonable take]”.
They’re so low effort and Reddit.
Good point, corrected.