I think it’s actually about 150 PB of data that’s then also georedundantly stored in the US and Netherlands. That sounds like a lot, but I think it would be possible to distribute that amount of data

How is that relevant if I’m talking about someone hosting their code on gitlab.com?

It has light mode by default and a UI that I find to be really unintuitive, but what really bothers me is that ppl go from one for-profit git host to another for-profit git host when things like Codeberg exist. With GitHub you could at least argue that you can turn your hobby project into a job since it has a huge userbase and stuff like github sponsors, but what does gitlab offer for you?

TL;DR: It’s not Codeberg

I get why ppl would use something other than github, but why do they have to torture me with gitlab?

Put the comma in the middle

Or say “Wow the crowd is going crazy for you Mr. Trump” followed by a shot of an empty row of seats

Is that a Framework Laptop?

Where 🫲🫱 did all the boy fights go? I’ve talked about this a while ago, I said “Wow 👐, where did all the boy fights go?” Back then there were boy fights now ☝️ there are no boy fights anymore, can you 🫵 believe this? Crooked Joe Biden turned all 👐 the boys gay so now they don’t fight ✊ no more, meanwhile Mexican boy fights are streaming up the border 🫴

I’ve just right now noticed that they are talking about the company…

Now generate a Beer drinking a Cat

🙏👐☝️☝️🤌💅🤲

Oh my god…

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1ehjuzj/i_bought_700k_worth_of_intel_stock_today/

🩵 (rizzler)

I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense

To be fair: there are many things where compression is a waste of CPU time, like fonts and about 90% of non-text media as they’re already compressed

That guy was talking about grayjay, a Client to follow creators on multiple platforms at the same time. Grayjay isn’t licensed under AGPL, but instead it uses the FUTO Temporary License. It technically still counts as source available, but I think the NC-Part is okay to have. AGPL would be nicer though especially bc of this.

Germany has a fund like that, GNOME just recently got a grant of about 1M Euros to improve features and provide better accessibility

The only thing I can see in their License that would make it non-free is the non-commercial redistribution part of it, which is not that bad