Update: I managed to create the symlink with the entire steamapps folder, to the point that Steam recognized the game as installed in /home while it was actually on /mnt. However, it failed to launch in the same way as it did when the symlink was not there.

I did now, it says Unhandled exception: System.TypeloadException: Could not load type of field ‘InstallerMesage.Form1+…’ due to: COuld not load file or assembly ‘Windows.Foundation.UniversalApiContract, …’ or one of its dependencies.

Does this tell you something?

PS: To clarify it is a rather long text that I get via the terminal when launching said game

I did now, it says Unhandled exception: System.TypeloadException: Could not load type of field ‘InstallerMesage.Form1+…’ due to: COuld not load file or assembly ‘Windows.Foundation.UniversalApiContract, …’ or one of its dependencies.

Does this tell you something?

deleted by creator

Linux mint, and I run the games via Steams. Indeed, I am aware of the DRM but the interesting part it only is a problem on the secondary drive and not on the primary drive. That must be pointing to the root cause… i just dont know what.

Hey thanks. It does look complicated indeed. Maybe I did something wrong and I think I created a symlink and not even know where/how to remove it. I am not sure I am capable of that. I hope that someone has an idea of the root cause for this strange behaviour (I dont mean about the symlink, but rather why games need the primary drive to run)

I see. When I tried the last step to move the game from /mnt to /home, it told me that it couldnt move because the folder already existed (the one i created in Step 1)

Thanks for the explanation, i will try. On Step 3, shouldn’t the game be installed in /mnt isntead of home?

I understood they backport security updates, but is that also for apps in the software manager? For example: Currently I am using Mint. The VLC version there is 3.0.20 which is behind 2 years (current is 3.0.23). According to the releases of VLC, it indicated security fixes. Do these get fixes within the old number or are they neglected? What do you think? I concord by the wya on what you say related to rolling distro vs stable.

And I never worried one time in my life about exploits in media files, it’s just extremely unlikely that between the time a 0day is discovered, and your system is updated (you do update frequently, right?), that torrent is going to exploit some player or media library.

Last time I heard of something like that, it was like 10 years ago, a gstreamer 0day that got quickly patched.

Executable files aren’t going to execute themselves. If you don’t chmod +x them they shouldn’t execute at all even if you click them. I guess it can depend on your system.

I am much more concerned about internet facing applications like a web browser or torrent client.

True, the combination of Media Player exploit + Linux + not patched, it is very unlikely. However, what if he is using a Debian based distro? Those may have a couple of year old version of VLC installed in the package manager for example…