

All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.
All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.
And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?
Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?
Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣
Came here to say this. The display has a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels. And this “journalist” tells me, that it looks good with a configured resolution of 1920 x 1080. Tells a lot about the quality of this review.
There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.
Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.
Can someone explain, what we see here? I am very curious to know more about it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I was always amazed by how utterly stupid an organism can be. And that thing survives somehow in nature.
Fully agree. Which is why I do security the classical way for now. The only thing I cannot do myself is protection against DDoS attacks. But I either use the solution of the hoster or use KeyCDN.
It leads to a bit more configuration overhead, but at least I am able to get rid of CF :)
Thanks for helping! Unfortunately non of the products listed are feature wise comparable to Cloudflare. Still appreciate your time!
Yes, it is not wasted in this case. But why should I produce less food the next day, if I can still sell everything? Sure, they earn less, but still enough to cover the costs. So they have no motivation to reduce production, as the financial impact is not as big.
Still not sure if I like the concept. Technically it should reduce food faste. On the other hand, sellers don’t get punished enough by overproducing. Because now they can sell the left overs, vs. having to throw them away.
That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.