• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree but that’s not limited to conservatism at all. Many liberals feel the same way in third person, outraged that anyone is wealthy if anyone else isn’t.

        • potpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A small amount of people are upset some people make a lot of money. A larger amount of people are upset others make 10,000x more than that.

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am just outraged that some people are starving because they can’t afford food while other people have so much money that they don’t even know how they could spend it all.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree that’s a bad thing, but people’s standard for too much money is always more than their own wealth. Shouldn’t all of us who consistently have a roof over our heads and aren’t hungry feel like part of the problem too? It seems to me that anyone enjoying a DoorDash meal, when the delivery charge and tip could feed a whole family somewhere, should feel at least some guilt and not just point the finger.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re also incredibly terrified at all times and so if they see someone being happier than before their monkey brain says “it’s probably you who’s about to get got!” and they lose their minds.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Explain to me how two women kissing causes an unrelated person’s purchasing power to be reduced.

        • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a social issue and lies on a separate axis from economic issues. Unfortunately in the US the capitalists refuse to give the voters an economic left option, so we have to settle for a capitalist party that panders to bigots, and a capitalist party that pretends to not be bigoted.

        • Redacted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because they’ll spend their free time enjoying each other’s company instead of buying things they don’t need?!

          Apologies, no context was provided so it seems I wrongly assumed it was related to quality of life in general, not social freedoms.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t buy into the lie. Most happiness grows when shared. It’s important to have enough, but no material goods bring nearly as much happiness as the joys of other people

        • Redacted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The key word is “enough”. Most people in the world spend the majority of their lives working to make money for someone else in order to put food on the table.

          More money means more time available to spend with their loved ones, from which happiness is derived as you say.