Dem Bosain@midwest.social to Political Weirdos @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoGlobal surveillance expert ignores evidence, declares "1936 Olympics a hoax"midwest.socialimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down14
arrow-up1103arrow-down1imageGlobal surveillance expert ignores evidence, declares "1936 Olympics a hoax"midwest.socialDem Bosain@midwest.social to Political Weirdos @lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoI would say just the fact that someone didn’t get murdered is a very weak argument to claim their life was not in danger. In other words, I think your assessment is less likely to be true than his.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThere was zero evidence his life was in danger. He just decided it was because he’s a whiner.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoNow you sound like a MAGA troll, spouting trivially refutable nonsense.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYes. You’ve figured me out. I’m a MAGA troll because I don’t automatically believe things without evidence. 🙄
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoNo, but because you make up stuff without evidence.
I would say just the fact that someone didn’t get murdered is a very weak argument to claim their life was not in danger. In other words, I think your assessment is less likely to be true than his.
There was zero evidence his life was in danger. He just decided it was because he’s a whiner.
Now you sound like a MAGA troll, spouting trivially refutable nonsense.
Yes. You’ve figured me out. I’m a MAGA troll because I don’t automatically believe things without evidence. 🙄
No, but because you make up stuff without evidence.
Such as?