• sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I think the laws we already have about free speech mean the government absolutely can’t tell a newspaper owner what to print. They can be held liable if they break laws, but not endorsing a candidate is not illegal.

      EDIT: If you don’t like what I’m saying that’s on you. The constitution of the US is pretty clear about this and the Supreme Court has upheld it numerous times. I don’t think it’s cool that Bezos did this, but I also don’t think that a law stopping someone from doing it is a good idea or even plausible in the US.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We absolutely have laws that regulate portions of news coverage. Yeah, they can’t tell them what to say or what not to say, but there could exist laws that prevent owners from exerting too much influence over it.

        • sploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          How would such a law work and not infringe on freedom of speech as it has been codified by jurisprudence?

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I thought your laws for example had standards about news vs entertainment, which is why the idiots at Fox keep getting away with misinformation.