You must log in or register to comment.
Good faith debate made me laugh, the dude was literally in the middle of moving the goal posts when gukrackk
🥱
Y’all gonna shit yourselves when he runs the table on the primaries.
You could organize now - maybe work out a name and some cool election swag? Or . . . Really any effort at all in promoting a person would be good. Lines are open, call now!
I laughed and assumed it was sarcastic.
Lol, it was. Everything he mentioned was the opposite of what Kirk did
Yeah, he’s dog whistling. Anyone tuning in who never heard of the guy sees the governer making a pretty stock response to an assassination of a political adversary. Anyone who knows what is going on knows it’s tongue in cheek
Hey, Gavin, STFU.
“Well you see sir the reason I deserve to be treated with human decency is that I think I’m a person, I know you disagree and we can agree to do so…”
The only time I’d “reach across the aisle” for fascist dipshits is to smash them in the face with a brick.
Lol, that was a subtle but scorching burn
Was it? Gavin had him on his podcast, I don’t think this was a dig. And while the lemmy jokes may be funny, I wouldn’t want any politician making light of any shooting. He should have just said nothing.
The key phrase being “in a democracy.” Are you sure that’s what you guys have?
If the Democrats run this guy in 2028 the country is over.
deleted by creator
it’ll be over then
it’s over now, too. but it’ll still be over then.
?
The states are already over. I think that what’s he said
They absolutely are not lol. Countries can coast for decades like this. See Russia. Also the United States has been in worse places than it is now.
I already pulled my $85.44 of investments out of the American stock market. Its over for you guys the funding is cut!
Gas prices gon’ go up because of you
The states aren’t over but the idea of American democracy is basically dead. The govt is just really fucking broken. Sure the country exists and will continue to do so, but the systems are clearly broken, corrupt, and rotten beyond the capability of the modern political reality to fix.
As far as I can see best we can hope so is dramatic reform, like many many new amendments that completely change how the govt works to the point where it’s questionable if it is really the same govt. And the sadly more realistic outcome might be that reform either won’t happen or will only come after much suffering and conflict
You don’t get tongue in cheek humor, do you?
Newsom rizzed up Kirk before, as the kids would say.
Are you saying that Newsom is being sarcastic in the post?
Uh… it’s already over. The Fascist Fuck sitting in the POTUS seat has already been trying to tell you this…
In any case, even in a non-rigged election, Newsom would get trashed just like Clinton.
If we even get to vote in the mid terms it’ll only be because the full roll out isn’t done yet.
The Red states are already voting in the midterms by preemptively choosing whose votes matter.
They just redistricted my state to ensure their wins… gods willing hotwheels finds a luigi
Clinton barely lost, mostly because idiots proclaimed that there was no point in voting because the system was already beyond repair.
Sounds like she sucked at making people believe she would make a difference, which given this is killary “we came we saw he died” KKKlinton who’s husband is behind the “tough on crime” bill that is largely responsible for the size of the current prison inmate population in seppoland is completely understandable. Get better candidates or stop being surprised why no one would show up to vote for you.
Wild that your argument hinges on Trump being the better candidate, as slightly more people showed up for him (in specific states).
How? His strategy wasn’t based on motivating minorities to vote for him but Hillary’s was. He appealed to the racists and won, and she tried to make the case that she would improve things and failed.
Well your argument seems to be that people will show up for a better candidate, and people showed up for him.
Ergo, you think he was the better candidate.
Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.
If you wait for perfection to happen without you, it will never come. You have to fight for something better. Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.
Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to participate unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you dont actually have do anything difficult to make things better yourself.
I dont get why everyone assumes this? I’m not in Seppoland but will always advocate for organizing with the PSL or DSA. That’s how NYC got Mamdani in position. Unless of course your argument is basically you refuse to do anything unless everyone else fixes everything for you, so you can then just vote for it.
Sometimes that means settling for something that’s not good enough yet so that things can get better later.
I mean thats basically your strat right? Keep voting for these candidates, Killary, Genocide Joe, Bomber Harris, now it looks like it could be gruesome newsom, until somehow, magically a good candidate that will fix everything comes along.
deleted by creator
Somebody get this dip shit a history book.
Yeah, sure… the MAGAs are an excellent example of Good Faith Debate 🤦
Charlie Kirk, famously a good faith debater lol
Yeah keep talking while the pedos steal the supreme court, jerry rig elections, ignore the bill of rights, and steal your retirement. Keep talking and talking and talking. That will fix this, more talking. Or…maybe…bash a fascist and when the next fascist comes along bash that Nazi too. The time for talking is over and all the neocons in government should get out of the fucking way.
What a fucking tool
