• SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like parent/child. Add something? Parent adopts. Remove something? Parent abandons, leaving the process or component with trauma that will require years of therapy.

    • stephan262@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms.

      • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to “main” seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think “secondary” has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn’t really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the “m/s”, but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where “sub” could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed.