The project, developed in partnership with veteran free software developer Rob Savoye, aims to create a fully free and open mobile platform, from the firmware to the operating system.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve got a Google Pixel 3a with postmarketOS installed on it right now for testing, and it really is a two-pronged issue with both hardware and software. Because it’s an older phone the battery drains within a few hours, nowhere close to all-day use. Because most of the software is designed for the desktop certain things are just impossible to use (the big pain point for me is Anki, but on the other hand it’s impressive how many GTK apps conform very nicely to the screen). The keyboard still feels pretty rough.

    Hopefully the FSF dipping their hat into the ring will help existing projects like this in a rising-tide-raises-all-ships sort of way. Would be a shame for them to put effort into a software stack that goes nowhere (GNU Hurd), and pour $$$ into a hardware project that doesn’t make it to market or doesn’t do its job better than a cracked smartphone from 5+ years ago.

    I think it is possible to switch to it now and have things mostly work out for you, but it will make your life harder. I remember switching to Ubuntu around 2010 and it’s almost to that level of experience. You’ll be giving up a lot, apps you “need” won’t work, but it’s at the point where it is a complete usable experience. For those that are willing to suffer for FOSS, I mean.

  • unexpected@forum.guncadindex.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m celebrating!

    As a linux phone guy this is good news. Any more pushing towards a more solid linux phone environment is a big plus.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        40 years ago was 1985.

        The first version of Microsoft Windows was released at that time, as an GUI overlay of MS-DOS.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows

        MS-DOS was released in 1981 as a corporate locked down OS, that he was aggressively pushing to lock down the PC market.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

        At the same time HP, IBM, and other early computing megacorps were pushing their own locked down OS’s that were partially built off the free software work of the universities.

        One example is HP-UX, which was released in 1984 and was a proprietary implementation of Unix System V, which itself was a commercial product from AT&T. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_V

        Things were extremely expensive and locked down back then, and we were just getting to the point where computers were becoming common in people’s homes. Most decently funded schools had dedicated computer labs at this point.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hopefully this will recruit projects that already have significant headstart, such as Pine64. Otherwise, it would merely be performative.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean when I was looking up there have been people that have been using the term libre phone for somewhere around a decade or so. Hell I found an old Reddit post from 8 years ago that talked about asking if it’d be possible to make a pure libre phone. And then of course it came across the Lebrim 5 that you mentioned there so I’m sure they originally used that term as well.

        Incidentally what do you think of the phone do you have just the standard one or do you have that premium one?

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      F-droid for Waydroid enabled Linux phones?

      • small userbase
      • high resource usage
      • still dependant on Google

      F-droid for AOSP Android

      • still dependant on Google

      Honestly, I prefer flatpaks with all the drawbacks, give me 100% freedom while providing Android like comfort… Like the new xdg permissions portal.

      If the price is no good maps or banking apps, I’ll gladly pay it. I just wish the graphene team worked on linux instead.

  • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly as long as they can fucking get something moderately priced that supports VOLTE and a decent camera I’ll buy it

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is absolutely hilarious, a fully libre phone? What processor are they going to use thats 100% libre? Then what OS will it use? Android-libre? What a joke

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d personally start by actually reading the announcement before complaining about it’s content but you do you I guess

      from the firmware to the operating system