A top NASA official urged the next administration to maintain current plans to return humans to the moon, warning that a change of destinations could result in a loss of U.S. leadership in space.
I’m conflicted on this. Artemis is a well designed political juggernaut, but NASA has budget and priority issues that the big expensive rocket, capsule, and station throw a wrench into. I’m hoping the redesigned Mars Sample Return works out and paves the way for a SpaceX and Blue Origin based redesign of Artemis.
I still don’t understand why NASA doesn’t make the lunar lander themselves, they are great at landers. Then contract out the ride to low lunar orbit.
I know it’s unprecedented, but surely a few Falcon Heavies could put a transfer stage, service module, and lander into LEO, to be assembled in-orbit. Heck it’s not even that unprecedented since Apollo had to be reconfigured in-orbit as well.
Yeah, this might fundamentally change the goals of Artemis, but it seems like relatively low hanging fruit compared to the bonkers complexity we’re trying now.
Even if the program sticks with Orion, I’m hoping later missions will try bidding out flights and cutting SLS out of the picture. I’m hoping that’s at least part of the purpose of spinning all of SLS off into a commercial entity.
If anything, I think they’re moving in the opposite direction of what you suggested for landers. They’re building up an industrial base of different companies building lunar landers for cheap.
I’m conflicted on this. Artemis is a well designed political juggernaut, but NASA has budget and priority issues that the big expensive rocket, capsule, and station throw a wrench into. I’m hoping the redesigned Mars Sample Return works out and paves the way for a SpaceX and Blue Origin based redesign of Artemis.
I still don’t understand why NASA doesn’t make the lunar lander themselves, they are great at landers. Then contract out the ride to low lunar orbit.
I know it’s unprecedented, but surely a few Falcon Heavies could put a transfer stage, service module, and lander into LEO, to be assembled in-orbit. Heck it’s not even that unprecedented since Apollo had to be reconfigured in-orbit as well.
Yeah, this might fundamentally change the goals of Artemis, but it seems like relatively low hanging fruit compared to the bonkers complexity we’re trying now.
Even if the program sticks with Orion, I’m hoping later missions will try bidding out flights and cutting SLS out of the picture. I’m hoping that’s at least part of the purpose of spinning all of SLS off into a commercial entity.
If anything, I think they’re moving in the opposite direction of what you suggested for landers. They’re building up an industrial base of different companies building lunar landers for cheap.