• Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably thinks it’s just a normal servant or slave, not a sexual one.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        To my understanding, that’s the way ancient Romans viewed it. For lack of more delicate and concise words, it manly to top, unmanly to bottom. Gay sex was acceptable if the sexual roles reflected their social roles.

      • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh, kind of like the rough and ready good ol boys from Deliverance showing those soft city boys what was what.