• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      One in five do not think Hitler was all bad. Two in five think he was better than a lady who laughs sometimes.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      My thoughts exactly. Wait though, actually that is the fault of Democrats, somehow. I’ll get back to you on how

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reminds me of this great street art I saw posted at some point. Can’t find the source though.

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s like watching a horror movie. You know the killer is in the basement, yet people go and have a look while the audience knows what’s going to happen. A classic fuck around and find out.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well we now know there are truly people stupid enough to do so.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well it ain’t the token black guy like in the movies. The African Americans largely didn’t vote for Trump.

  • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s not fair phrasing and will lead to high numbers.

    Hitler wasn’t “all” bad technically, he was just so bad that the good shouldn’t matter at all. Pushing forward technology (VW Beetle, Autobahn) should is no way be justified by genocide (obviously).

    A better question would have been something like “do you like Hitler overall?”

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The full poll data: https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Views_on_Hitler_poll_results.pdf

      Do you think of Adolf Hitler as. . . ?

      • A completely good person: 1%
      • A good person who did some bad things: 4%
      • An equally good and bad person: 7%
      • A bad person who did some good things: 12%
      • A completely bad person : 65%
      • Not sure : 12%

      So 12% felt he was at least as good as he was bad, 12% fell into the 'well, even a horrible person can do something right, and 12% were somehow not sure…

      • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is interesting, thank you for sharing.

        I personally would tally this up as “12%” rather than “24%”.

        Or at least in my opinion, option “D” (bad person that did some good things) is most likely the closest to an objective answer and “E” (completely bad) is a totally acceptable summary. But both D and E both summarize Hitler as bad. The people summarizing him as “balanced” or “good” totaled to 12%.

        To be clear, this is still horrific imo.

        • Resand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          and 12% not sure aka couldn’t really make up their mind if Hitler was bad or not… so ads up to 24%

          • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s fair, but we don’t know why they said they weren’t sure. Could be educational issues, memory issues, etc.

            Not a good look either way. Wild to me that number is so high.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I feel like “equally bad and good” certainly also deserves that label in this case.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes a question about Hitler being good overall is far better. Attempting to shove him into an all bad category is just dishonest and allows opponents a free win. The good absolutely should matter, because painting people as all one thing isn’t accurate and makes understanding how things happen more difficult.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah, but that can’t possibly be true - which we ofc all know it can’t be, yet what you said is a very standard thing to say.

        (Even “killing Hitler” was at that point of no good consequence - but “he” (?) would have been a hero if he killed Hitler at least one year sooner … but also max about 22 years earlier … so he completely missed the window on that “one redeeming quality” as well … so that whole thing is just a nonsense saying.)

    • JayObey711@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is literally nothing I can think of that would make him good in any isolated field. For a long time people held the believe that he was pro environment and animal rights. But he also killed his own dog. People also say that he had a special aura around him. That he was very charming. But those people were likely like trump supporters today. My great grandmother actually got to see him before she fled Germany. She said that there was nothing particularly interesting about him except for the way he speaks maybe.

      • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The question is still to vague. Obviously all of his politics were the worst. But the way it’s phrased, you’d kinda have to agree he wasn’t ALL bad if, for example, he made a pretty tasty pasta sauce. Like. Not that it’d be relevant. It’s the vagueness of the question that I’m critiquing. Maybe I’m just having an autism moment.

        • sab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nah, it’s deliberately formulated so it can be pulled out of context, misrepresented and cause outrage. And it works.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Even without or beyond judging the person, it’s the actions, results, and consequences of those actions too.

      Which is even more complex, but important for understanding the context.

      But it’s def really important to avoid black & white (wrongful) memefication, bcs suddenly the memetic value (the “idea” that the image of Hitler represents to masses on average) is vastly corrupted & serves other purposes.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    I sometimes fear that
    people think that fascism arrives in fancy dress
    worn by grotesques and monsters
    as played out in endless re-runs of the Nazis.

    Fascism arrives as your friend.
    It will restore your honour,
    make you feel proud,
    protect your house,
    give you a job,
    clean up the neighbourhood,
    remind you of how great you once were,
    clear out the venal and the corrupt,
    remove anything you feel is unlike you…

    It doesn’t walk in saying,
    “Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution.”

    –Michael Rosen.

    • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      It doesn’t walk in saying, “Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution.”

      Yeah but evidently it does, and people still choose it.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    We’ve got to stop talking about “if” and “when.”

    It’s NOW. This is happening. We are watching the rise of the next Hitler, now, live, today. This isn’t hypothetical anymore - yesterday just gave them carte blanche to go full stormtroopers.

    At this point, all of our conversations need to be about how we stay safe in the wake.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We got to stop talking about NOW as if its only just started. Weve been building and locking people in concentration camps for decades.

      We have been massacring civilians for decades. We have been profiting off of a genocide for over a year.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Ok, I get it, but we really should avoid looking at things/people like Adolfy as black or white - that just makes it a meme & loses actual historical/lecture value.

    With Hitler being a one-dimensional idea/meme/brand instead of a human (supported by humans with rational human causes) I’m afraid we are doomed to repeat the same cycle of mistakes.

    What I’m saying is that instead of education we have strong propaganda (after a specific date) that taught us this Hitler brand was just & only bad, like it was a spontaneous event. Instead of a full person & a nation (again full of actual people) with voting rights in irl situations.
    And propaganda isn’t free, it’s financially fueled, which means it wants something in return.

    Monsters are humans. We need to remember that, despite what we are preached.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kind of a loaded question to include the word “all” but I understand the lack of faith or respect for the USA right about now.