• MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      The solutions here don’t seem to really be solutions in my opinion, especially the third one. It’s like if the problem a patent solves was “being able to individually package sandwiches on a conveyor belt” and the solution was “have a machine that recognizes where one sandwich ends and another begins so it can stop and start packaging appropriately.” Like, no kidding, but how?

    • Grangle1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      So the first two seem to deal with throwing a capture item at a creature (wild pokemon) and/or releasing a character’s own creature to fight it (essentially first seen in Legends Arceus, tossing a ball at a pokemon to aggro it and then fighting it with your pokemon). The third one is, as others have said, Mount transitions (at least in pokemon, also first seen in Legends Arceus if you only count ride pokemon; if vehicles are included I believe the first would be Sword/Shield). Though if vehicles are included Nintendo would have a hard time fighting that one. Vehicle transformation, especially in racing games, has been around forever.

        • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          These look like they are after Palworld was released. Was Nintendo just sitting on the patent since Pokeman red/blue? What an unintuitive legal system they have over in Japan.

          • IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            How can you infringe on a patent that doesn’t exist when you’re writing the code?hopefully Palworld can afford the lawyers to kill this off now.

    • Grofit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      If these were stories I was picking up to implement I would be asking the BA to elaborate some more 😂

    • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Looking through the first one’s content and it seems reasonable? The patent’s abstract is supposed to be as widely applicable as legally permitted, so it’s like a completely different language on top of legalese.